listen to what I say. Come on people...no matter what she says she is...demo/repub...all the same...all the way down the line from Bush #1 then clitonto Bush #2...they are all the bush addministration. Hence we are all tired of the repulican stuff, sure we would like to get a demo to lead us away from all the crap. Sure let Hilary be demo...she steps in...and takes over right where bush lead off. There is now way, she would damage her investments they have in this Iraq war.The clitons have over 25 contractor inn Iraq alone, beside the 150,000 that bush has....She is using the peoples fears of bush to claim this presidency....you better watch out. Answer this. If she is so against everything that Bush stands for...why would he help fund her campaign...thi sis just my thoughts....i have a right to those....
2007-10-03 19:36:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
believeme, i would love to have a women President in my life time...but this just doesn't seem right, with all the connections they have together...
2007-10-03 19:37:35 · update #1
hi, think you're wrong. it's the reagan administration.
reagan
bush
clinton
bush
next up hillary clinton
then jeb bush
then chelsea is of age
then perhaps young laura bush
a dynasty
2007-10-03 19:45:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well You are right about Hillary Hitler! America wouldn't last one year if that where to happen .I got to tell ya It's funnier then Hell watching a Liberal bash Clinton. One last thing I find it very hard to believe Bush would back Hillary Hitler. But you are on a roll so keep going !!! Who's next ObUma Yea he's another Idiot Liberal go get him! Then the rest of the stinking Liberals! Then you will realize Republicans are the best choice by Far for this country .And one day you might even become smart enough to be a Republican........
2007-10-03 19:55:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I snort on the persons who help Hilary. that's not an oppertunity to grow to be president for Hilary - that's a "enable's-See-Who-Can-Insult-Bush-The-Worst... contest. specific, she went to varsity. Yeah, she does understand the thank you to throw in some not consumer-friendly words in her sentances. yet heavily, do you ever hear her communicate approximately the rest, different than complaining how badly Bush is working issues? She says that she will in basic terms snap her hands and pull the troops out of Iraq. does not she understand that the terrorist accessible are nevertheless going to be working accessible? shall we've various greater 9/11's if we enable up our guards long adequate. She says in basic terms what the team needs to hearken to, like Kerry, because of the fact that's inquisitive appropriate to the popularity.
2016-10-21 00:02:05 · answer #3 · answered by bachmann 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton has a snowballs chance in HELL even getting the NOMINATION from the Democratic Party LET ALONE run and be voted President!
I have a gut feeling that Barack Obama will win the Democratic Party's Nomination for President.
The one woman that COULD remotely be elected President would be Condoleezza Rice.
2007-10-03 19:54:34 · answer #4 · answered by jennifersuem 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Where did you see that Bush was funding Clinton's campaign? That seems a bit odd.
I think she is a fine Cackler!
Hillary in 2008--Just elect the witch !!
2007-10-03 19:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by whrldpz 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You really do not like a woman to be the President. If not , do you have any other eminent woman from any of the parties or any one outside the political arena to give a tough fight to Hillary and even defeat her by a very wide margin.
2007-10-03 19:47:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is funding Clinton's campaign - any evidence of this?
As for her being no different to Bush (or Bill Clinton being no different to Bush) where have you spent the last 20 years.
Responsible fiscal management vs throw away spending. Taxing the rich more instead of less. Working with multilateral global treaties and organizations instead of trying to undermine them. Reducing poverty instead of corporate welfare. This is the difference between Bill Clintons era and Bush's. They could not be more different.
2007-10-03 19:46:02 · answer #7 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hillary had flipped flopped on many issues and it is the reason why many voters tend to shy away from her.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Hillary will likely win.
2007-10-03 19:42:00 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
there nothing alike, hillery is nothing , but a chicken in a pant suit. Bush is not the best, but not a chicken, he wants to stand up against the enemy, she wants to surrender, and run. like a chicken.
2007-10-03 19:48:43 · answer #9 · answered by paul b 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Did you have a question?
2007-10-03 19:40:50 · answer #10 · answered by Sordenhiemer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋