Before you answer, please read all of the questions and then gather you ACTUAL FACTS that you have proven yourself [not by media or someone else] before you prove me wrong. Lets all be civilised and not make personal remarks please. Thanks. PS. I dont expect many answers
1. Jet Fuel causes a black thick and sticky cloud of smoke/smog that burns for a very long time and spreads rapidly with EXTREME heat. Please look at the pentagon after pictures and tell me what 'white goods' and creme coloured walls you see un- smoke or fire damaged.
2. Look at as many CLEAR pictures as you can, of a plane entering the Towers. Look verrrry hard and find its windows. Please dont take this one as an absolute joke. Just look around on the net and find some etc.PLEASE!
3. Why was there no video evidence of a plane entering the pentagon?. Not one of the security video's facing the Pentagon was operational and immediatley after, a service station's recordings were confiscated my GOVT officers.
2007-10-03
19:21:37
·
22 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Other - News & Events
Also. WOW. they found One tinyest little peice of plane reckage UNDAMAGED a hundred meters away from the pentagon. MORE TO COME AS I THINK
2007-10-03
19:22:49 ·
update #1
OK. FOR THOSE WHO ASK THAT IF WHAT IM SAYING IS FACT.... YOU DIDNT READ REAL WELL, PROOVE OUT OF MULTIPLE PICTURES AGAINST WHAT IM SAYING. PROOVE BEFORE YOU ANSWER, NOT ANSWER BEFORE YOU SEE WHAT IVE ASKED YOURSELF.
2007-10-03
19:34:40 ·
update #2
NO ONE THAT IS LEAVING 'SEMI NOT NICE' MESSAGES DONT REALLY SEEM TO BE SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT MY 3 QUESTIONS..... NOR LOOKING?
2007-10-03
19:42:09 ·
update #3
People that are leaving me sites of pictures of planes hitting buildings. It dosent answer my quetion of "can you see the windows of the plane"? I dont belive a consp or Binladen. Im not making a decision until the truth is unvailed.
2007-10-04
17:13:11 ·
update #4
The nature of 'the event' was designed to be so big that the population would believe anything that they were told. That obviously succeeded. Do you remember the phone calls, of the desperate passengers heading towards their deaths; well, when it was proved that those phone calls would have been impossible, it's as if they never happened. You don't hear of them anymore. 9/11 proved one thing to me. It is true that they cannot fool all the people all the time, however, they can certainly fool 'nearly' all the people all the time. That is all that they need to do.
2007-10-04 06:14:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
First off I used to be a B-52 Bomber Pilot. We carried more Jet Fuel than the planes that hit the towers and the Pentagon. When Jet Fuel is in a confined space and burnt, by this I mean the engine, its exhaust is clear and hot. On the ground you can see the white lines extending behind an airplane at altitude. This is caused by condensation of the hot gasses and the cold air. In a unconfined space Jet Fuel burns white, black, and red at different times, temperatures, and oxygen levels. The reference to back draft is right.
No building is designed to withstand the force of a 350,000 pound plus object moving at over 450 miles per hour. Also, if you were at the top of the towers or the top of the Pentagon and had a surface to air missile and shot at the airplane the result would be nothing. The momentum of the aircraft would continue it on its course.
The bottom line is that I can prove anything or disprove anything by the right or wrong interpetation of the facts. Who was on the grassy knoll when JFK was shot? Was Lee Harvey Oswald working alone or was he a patsy? Were there two gunmen when RFK was shot? Was Serhan Serhan a patsy? How did John Hinkley get close enough to Regan to shoot him? and on and on...... Why was John Lennon killed? Was it because the killer liked the Rolling Stones better? I can give you conspiracy theories until my fingers don't type anymore.
You believe what you want. What I say or anyone else says will not change your mind, Rosey O'Donnell. Have a nice life.
2007-10-04 05:22:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conspiracy theories are very easy to prove - they need no evidence - just hearsay
Yes, in the right conditions, jet fuel will cause a thick cloud of dense, acrid smoke. Specifically where there is a lack of oxygen to ensure proper reaction of the hydrocarbons present. (These conditions were reported in the Twin Towers). The fireball created by igniting a highly flammable liquid will draw in oxygen (if it is immediately available) by the physical properties of hot air rising creating a vacuum - ask any fireman about flashpoint and backdraft
If jet fuel normally caused thick black clouds of smoke - wouldn't airports be the dirties places on the planet?
By its very nature, the Pentagon is a sensitive, secured operation. They control all media (within reason) within a predefined zone immediately around the buildings - you won't see anything that could embarrass the military, or otherwise provide succour to an enemy. Consider the unbalanced and judgemental media treatment of these events initially. The attacks were totally unexpected and prompted enormous efforts to stop future occurrences.
btw: Wreckage could never be considered undamaged. DUH!!!
2007-10-04 03:17:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by cornflake#1 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
I think I can answer some of your questions. I'll just do the Pentagon to save space:
The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
Everyone should look at this. The report contains color photos from the relevant Pentagon security camera which was going at 1 frame/sec. It shows a blurry shot of the plane.
The report contains abundant proof that a plane hit the Pentagon. Eg, on page 26 it says:
“The remains of most of the passengers on the aircraft were found near the end of the travel of the aircraft debris. The front landing gear (a relatively solid and heavy object) and the flight data recorder (which had been located near the rear of the aircraft) were also found nearly 300 ft into the structure. By contrast, the remains of a few individuals (the hijacking suspects), who most likely were near the front of the aircraft, were found relatively close to the aircraft’s point of impact with the building."
The remains of the passengers were taken to the Medical Examiners office where it was DNA-matched to many relatives.
------------------------
The above can be coupled with the following to show, without any doubt, that a "missile" did not hit the Pentagon:
(1) Dozens, if not hundreds, of people stuck on I-395 saw the low-flying plane & their testimony is well-documented in the press. The following is a direct quote from Wikipedia; the footnotes give you the source in media:
... Steve Riskus witnessed the plane crash into the Pentagon, as he was driving along Washington Boulevard and stopped to take photographs moments after the impact.[21] Mary Lyman, who was on I-395, saw the airplane pass over at a "steep angle toward the ground and going fast" and then saw the cloud of smoke from the Pentagon.[22] Jim Sutherland, also on I-395, witnessed the plane pass 50 feet overhead, heading in a straight line into the Pentagon.[23] Mary Ann Owens, of Gannett News Service, was stuck in traffic near the Pentagon when she saw the airplane pass 50 to 75 feet overhead and crash into the Pentagon.[24] Another witness, Daryl Donley, saw the crash as he was driving on Washington Boulevard. Among debris that was scattered as the plane crashed, he found a "scorched green oxygen tank marked 'Cabin air. Airline use'" on the road.[24] Mr. Donley also had a camera with him, and took some of the first photographs after the crash.[25] USA Today reporter Mike Walter, while driving on Washington Boulevard, also witnessed the crash.[26] He recounted to CNN, "...looked out my window. I saw this plane, the jet, American Airlines jet coming. And I thought, this doesn't add up. It's really low. And I saw it. It just went — I mean, it was like a cruise missile with wings, it went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon. Huge explosion."[13]
( Wikipedia, American Airlines Flight 77)
(I've omitted half of the eye-witnesses to save space)
================
2) Clear wreckage of a plane was found & photographs were printed in all the papers. Here's a nice photo from 9/11 that clearly shows plane wreckage:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)
================
3)Yes, the hole in the Pentagon was somewhat smaller than the diameter of the plane. This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University. Professor Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size that determines the size of the hole. The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it more fluid than solid and this explains why you get the hole you got. (Sozen quoted from Pop Mech book)
=====
4) The competing theory, that American Airlines Flight 77 disappeared into thin air with all its passengers, is not too convincing.
....
I hope this helps!!
2007-10-04 16:33:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by J 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sweetie, it is obviously bugging you badly. However, people died in the Pentagon, lost limbs, sight and some their heads. There was a great big gaping hole in the side of the building.
A plane did it. We saw the pictures at the time, and we have heard from the survivors since.
The Pentagon is a Military building under tight security restrictions. To continually show these images of a terror attack on it, would demoralise the country (US) . It is supposed to be the American FORT - untouchable.
Here we go.. some images to satisfy your lust.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GFRC,GFRC:2007-04,GFRC:en&q=pentagon%20plane%209%2F11&oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi
2007-10-04 07:22:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Go onto youtube.com and type in 911 facts. There are so many facts to prove that the government planned the attack. The buildings would not have collapsed from a plane hitting them. They were built to withstand these such attacks!
If the planes did cause the buildings to fall, why were there demolition bangs sometime after the planes had hit? Why wasn't the plane shot down as it enetered the pentagon air space? Its all a load of shite. The government had something to do with this. You sheeple just don't want to admit it!
2007-10-04 04:19:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by DizzyBiiaatch 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Somethin's gotta give before we all go to h*ll in a hand basket. At least you speak your mind and have conviction, which is a lot more than I can say about A LOT of Americans. Since when is it a bad thing to speak your mind? Look up Ron Paul, dude explains quit a bit. Oh, and, by the way, everything he said, CAN BE PROVEN! Yeah, it sounds like a conspiracy theory-hence-THEORY, make your own if you wanna argue with him. Believe what everyone tells you so that when you see a grain of truth, you don't even know what the h*ll you're lookin at because you want to be controlled. If that's YOUR bag of beans-fine- but DON'T YOU DARE tell me-or him-for that matter, that it's WRONG because YOU SAY SO!
2007-10-04 02:36:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by reddsonja83 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
All can find photo which gives impression of smoke not actually being from tower. other information search came back error report.Think foreign policy and propaganda towards countries linked issue needs to be adressed. Puffs of smoke said to come out of tower. Once before bombing attack carr attempted at World Trade Center could be two pronged attack then if not plane.
2007-10-04 04:00:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by darren m 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The strangest thing is that there were video cameras set up to record the planes flying in to the twin towers. These weren't just hand held tourist pictures, a video camera had been set up to record the event. Why use a video camera to take a picture of a stationary building in any case?
2007-10-04 02:37:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
2 Words for you
THANK YOU for having a free open mind and not jus believe what ever propoganda that gets thrown at you
if you want facts thiers to many but ill give you a briefing
afganistaan wanted tenders to pull a pipeline under the ocean to pull their resources, USA made a proposal but got turned down argentina got the deal, look in economics and politics around time period 9/11 in argentina their goverments resigned and had some chaos,
So they needed a motive to go to war to steal from afganistan who so happens to be controlled by bin laden
If Bin Laden did attack it wont be the USA but rather Isreal coz his freedom fight is for palestine the homeland of his mother and why attack on a day when theres no jews at work and wheres the black box from the plane, and CNN blasterd World Wide The Identities of the pilots
now imagine this you get up 1 day in egypt,saudi and Pakistaan and see your face on the front page of every newspaper Published that you flew a plane in a building and committed suicide but you still alive on the other side of the world far away from USA, the american public thinks that they know who the Hi jackers were and lets go get payback,
after afganistan ,iraq and next iran
so whos next in Bush's Foriegn Policy of Blood For Oil
2007-10-04 04:22:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cagen 2
·
1⤊
3⤋