What is the best book to get a Creationist thinking about evolution?

Question

A Creationist friend of mine has agreed to read a book of my choosing about evolution.

What is the best book I can give to my Creationist friend to get him thinking about the validity of evolution by natural selection?

Answer 1

"Finding Darwin's God:
A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God & Evolution"
- By Kenneth Miller

Miller is a professor of biology at Brown University, and a devout Christian (a Catholic).

...

If you want other suggestions, I gave a number of books, and some links, on Christian perspectives on evolution, as an answer to this question just a few hours ago:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Asgq0RWOz3xMWNDpbz9jkYzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071003171428AAYk5XZ&show=7#profile-info-5Dkskjv2aa

Answer 2

with the help of definition, atheism is the international view that denies the existence of God. To be greater specific, classic atheism (or offensive atheism) genuinely affirms that there by no ability grow to be, isn't now, and by no ability would be a God in or previous the international. yet can this dogmatic declare be verified? The atheist won't be able to logically tutor God's nonexistence. And right here is why: to appreciate that a transcendent God does not exist will require a suited wisdom of all issues (omniscience). to accomplish that documents will require simultaneous get entry to to all factors of the international and previous (omnipresence). subsequently, to verify of the atheist's declare one would could very own godlike traits. needless to say, mankind's limited nature precludes those specific understanding. The offensive atheist's dogmatic declare is subsequently unjustifiable. As truth seeker Mortimer Adler has stated, the atheist's attempt to tutor a extensive-unfold unfavorable is a self- defeating proposition. The Christian could subsequently emphasize that the offensive atheist isn't able to grant a logical disproof of God's existence. *shielding Atheism.* Many state-of-the-paintings atheists on the instant are totally conscious of the philosophical pitfalls linked to offensive or dogmatic atheism. sought after atheists including Gordon Stein and Carl Sagan have admitted that God's existence won't be able to be disproven. This has led such atheists to recommend what I call shielding atheism. shielding atheism asserts that mutually as God's existence won't be able to be logically or empirically _disproven,_ that's however _unproven._ Atheists of this variety have surely redefined atheism to intend "a loss of theory in God" truly than "a denial of God's existence." For this greater reasonable form of atheism, the assumption of "God" is like that of a unicorn, leprechaun, or elf. mutually as they are able to't be _dis_proven, they proceed to be _un_proven. shielding atheism's unbelief is grounded interior the rejection of the proofs for God's existence, and/or the theory that the Christian theory of God (or the different God) lacks logical consistency.