2007-10-03 15:54:39 · 21 answers · asked by julio_slsc 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Face it, this Republican Ron Paul will end the war, Obama the Democrat just talks.
2007-10-03 15:55:28 · update #1
This is a no brainer, Ron Paul. This man has twenty years of serving in the government and doing exactly what he says he is going to do. We all better hurry up and tell the corrupt government and all politicians we are mad as hell and we are not going to take it anymore. We cant fund healthcare for kids but we can pass another budget for the war at 190 billion, something is wrong in Kansas Dorthy and we have to stand up be patriots for our beloved country and fight for our freedoms, our kids lives and all others being killed by our foriegn policy gone wrong. 72% of the military now want us out, wonder why more military servicemen have donated to Ron Paul than any other.
Obama will fall right into the elites agenda. Naive is the man and it would draw him into the power fray and he will continue the madness as all other republican or democrats will. For the love of god people liaten to Ron Paul and understand why this man has normal middleclass people practically running the campaign for him. The third quarter Ron raised over 5 million from we the people not big lobbyist or corporations as all others do. Also ROn raised in the last week over 1.2 million from people that have been so enlightened to discover this diamond in the rough. Do your American duty and support , donate and push for Ron in the primaries he will unite us all instead of divide as the other candidates do.
2007-10-03 16:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by stephenmwells 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well, it raises an important question that no one has really asked: how possible is it for a newly elected President to end a war, whether he has the intention or not?
We have to remember there are a number of national and international interests--public, corporate, and private--that are heavily invested upon de facto American occupation of the Iraqi state. It took ten years and 57,000 American lives for America to pull out of Vietnam after Kennedy decided to back off. The military-industrial complex alone (which Paul has criticized) is extraordinarily powerful.
So, really the intention to end the war is easy; effecting it is another matter entirely. I am guessing that both Obama and Paul would have their work cut out for them.
Cheers.
2007-10-03 16:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by blueevent47 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama has voted the same as Hillary on every pro-war bill in congress except for voting to go into Iraq. In the last debate Obama could not guarantee that we would be out of Iraq by 2013. Vote for Ron Paul and our troops can: "Just come home".
2007-10-03 17:05:22 · answer #3 · answered by bballvr14 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'll take either over Hillary and I'll take Ron Paul over Obama.
I don't like all of RP's positions and I will say that Obama is better at actually giving an answer to a question than Hillary.
2007-10-03 16:14:59 · answer #4 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul!!! Obama is a joke just like Clinton.
2007-10-04 07:27:57 · answer #5 · answered by Mobus 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The shape grew to become into written over 3 hundred to 4 hundred years in the past. From recommendations that have been concept-approximately 800 to 4 hundred years in the past. i'm not asserting the form is undesirable, because of the fact I accept as true with merely approximately a hundred% of it. yet to stick to the form blindly a hundred% isn't probable not the suited ingredient interior the international. (we could desire to continually get wiser and picture of extra powerful recommendations, not in elementary terms stick to those surpassed right down to us) so as that reason approximately Ron Paul is stupid. "additionally why are we not accepting the reality that our dollar will fall down, as quickly as we enable the federal reserve to proceed printing it at loopy expenditures. could we experience to blame that we are robbing our youngster's destiny?" Why are you attempting to scare us into vote casting Ron Paul? i don't admire you. to boot, it fairly is not too not elementary to foretell the destiny. merely make guesses and whilst your suitable you tell it to the generic public, whilst your incorrect, nicely... you do not tell it to the generic public.
2016-11-07 05:11:32 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul would end the war. If the US would get attack again, he'd declare war the proper way - by following the Constitution and make Congress declare war and finish it with dignity. He will not let the UN by pass our Constitution.
2007-10-03 16:16:08 · answer #7 · answered by amalone 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul hands down!
2007-10-03 15:58:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul would end the Iraq war, but if the Islamo-fascists attacked the USA again, he would defend our nation.
Obama would convert to Islam.
2007-10-03 16:08:29 · answer #9 · answered by freedom_vs_slavery 3 · 8⤊ 0⤋
all of the canidates beside ron paul will continue the war. clinton and obama flip flop while the right is gun ho
ron paul has been the same since the 80's.
Ron paul in 2008
2007-10-03 17:15:40 · answer #10 · answered by Boston George 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋