I have two I would support; Rudi Giuliani or John McCain. The rest seem to me to be pandering to the right of the Republican party. However, being a Democrat they would have to address issues such as universal health care and the stabilization of Social Security. Both of these are needed in this country.
2007-10-03 15:11:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by NavyVet64 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Personally, I think the dems have a great group running which should help keep the democratic support they need but lost to GW Bush. I don't think that spillage is going to occur this time around.
Like you, I find Guilliani the most acceptable Republican although Huckabee is more moderate than people realize. He doesn't have the votes though in a general election. He's no Jimmy Carter as far as charisma and smarts.
The problem with Gulliani though is he may end up as fanatical as GW when it comes to the war and that would work against him.
2007-10-03 15:20:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
My husband was just taking a quiz from the front of USA Today that rated how we agreed with different candidates, or they with us. I didn't like some of the questions on the quiz, because they were "false choices" but it was still an interesting exercise. It also did not ask about some fiscal policies that drive me crazy. My "candidates" didn't stack up the way I thought they would. In fact one popped up as being in my camp that I had almost dismissed. Guess I need to research a couple of these people more closely.
2007-10-03 16:36:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Arby 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Barack Obama and Rudy Giuliani are top choices of many voters because of their similar stances on critical issues.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-10-03 18:10:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
specific,,and curiously like a significant McCain marketing campaign contributor is somebody close to bill Ayers On Wednesday morning, John McCain's marketing campaign released a catalogue of one hundred former ambassadors endorsing the GOP presidential nominee. 2d on the record, however her call is misspelled, is Leonore Annenberg, presently the president and chairman of the Annenberg commencing place and widow of ambassador and philanthropist Walter Annenberg. Ms. Annenberg grow to be herself the "chief of protocol" on the State branch decrease than President Reagan. If the final call sounds extensive-unfold, that's because of the fact it additionally graces the call of the Chicago training board the place Barack Obama and William Ayers sat interior the room six cases mutually.
2016-10-20 23:33:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by hussaini 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im an IND and im voting for ron paul baby, oh yeah
Paul would be a fresh face to america, he is the most qualified, ask any fourtune 500 company who they would want to run there company, Ron Paul.
If you want to get out of debt Ron Paul, if you want to change the thinking that has kept the poor poor and the allowed the rich to profit, vote for paul.
2007-10-03 17:22:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Boston George 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm a democrat too , but definately John McCain . Anyone who could live after being a P.O.W . for as long as he was , is definately someone worth looking at in my book . Anyone would be a beeter president than Bush .
2007-10-03 15:15:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by cindy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
NONE of the above, below or other. This is the answer to both of your questions. If you would actually vote for anyone the other party nominates over the candidate your party nominates, you are NOT in the right party. Admit that and join the party you agree with.
2007-10-03 15:49:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
In truth, most Democrats support Ron Paul. They gave him $5 million last quarter.
2007-10-03 15:10:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Maybe you shouldn't vote for the party, but the person that you agree with the most.
Ron Paul is the winner for me.
2007-10-03 16:45:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by sargenthp 2
·
0⤊
1⤋