President Bush is only following orders from his masters he wants to get war started with Iran before he leaves office , if he does he will be assured his brother will be elected for president down the road, after all you scratch my back and I will scratch yours, and you can be assured Aipac has been dong a lot of scratching during his terms.of course pres Bushie has been doing his share of scratching to , mostly with American tax payers money and our men's blood ,all to satisfy Aipac, why do you think our men are fighting in Iraq now???
for those of you who yell national security, how many country's has Iraq invaded?? if you say Kuwait?? Kuwait belonged to Iraq long before the British separated them, so what about Iran how many country's have they invaded?? how many has Israel invaded? how many has America invaded? if you say W,M,D who said that, the same ones who said Iraq had W,M,D, are we going to let Georgie B.S. us again? now they say Iran is giving weapons to the Iraquies? waht about the Rockefellers supplying weapons to the North Koreans and the North Veits?? I don't suppose that counts ??
smsmith, yes I do think it would be good , it just might make Israel think twice before killing the Palestainins and bulling them to death.
2007-10-03 14:38:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well, first thing, Iraq has quite a limited oil supply, and less than 5% of US oil comes from them. On the other hand, we get 50% of our oil from Canada and Mexico, why havent we invaded them? They have "insurgents" in our country, why not? Maybe because they arent psychopaths that want to destroy us and slaughter millions, they just want to get along.
Maybe he is telling the truth, After all, UN scientists did find traces of highly enriched uranium. These are the same guys who didnt find it in Iraq, If they found it there, then its there.
I find it slightly ignorant that everyone thinks that the president is trigger happy, even after he has become the only person in world history to get a country to give up WMD's not once, but twice.
North Korea actually has a larger army than we do, so a war would be catastrophic. The president has come closer to ending this 60 year standoff than any other person EVER.
Not only has he gotten a summit between the north and south once, he did it twice, got the north to give up its nuclear program, and provided aid to the millions of starving north Koreans.
But even before that, even before the war started, The president got Lybia to give up its entire WMD stockpiles, literally 200 tons of the worlds most lethal chemicals, and nuclear equipment.
I dont know how you are refering to this as another fear card, because that fear card has turned out to be the truth 2 of 3 times, and now it appears that he may have been correct all 3 times. General Sada, The head of the Iraqi army in the first gulf war, wrote an entire book about how he witnesses russian scientists and troops come into iraq and bulldoze buildings and remove traces of wepons. Guess what? Those satelite pictures that were shown before the war that show that buildings have been removed, they are the same ones hes says he saw removed. Not only that, some of the other generals who are on trial have validated his story even though he hasnt talked to them since 2000.
Not only that, there are now tapes of Saddam talking with his scientists about weapons that could potentially be used on Washington DC, he actually says its a matter of time before it happens.
It doesnt matter how many times you claim that he was wrong, or that the evidence is faked, or that it was for oil, IF YOU DONT HAVE ANY PROOF WHATSOEVER, THEN ITS ALL JUST IN YOUR HEAD.
2007-10-03 22:20:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doggzilla 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Considering Iran's DIRECT link to terrorism over the last few decades, considering Iran's President calling for the destruction of Israel and the United States, considering Iran giving Hamas rockets to shoot into Israel and KILL innocent people how can a warning be considered playing any card other then caution?
Do people still think Iraq was a war for oil? If it is WHERE IS THE OIL? Haven't we taken control over the oil rigs yet? Why try to rebuild the country, just control the oil if it is a war for oil right? People that say this is a war for oil are ignorant of the truth and are repeating what they were told by other ignorant people.
2007-10-03 21:47:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by badbender001 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Do you think an Iran armed with Atomic weapons will be good or bad?
2007-10-03 21:40:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Nope anyone warning us is not playing the "fear card".
If you can't see the problem with Iran having nukes.
Not much help for you.
2007-10-03 21:33:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
That is not a game. National security is only a game to those on the left.
2007-10-03 21:32:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Didn't Al Gore just scare us all with his "Global Warming"????
2007-10-03 21:33:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Quickie D 3
·
3⤊
1⤋