am i the only one that agrees with bushes veto of the health care plan funded by cigarette taxes?

Question

i lived in california for 20 years and saw how miserablly that other programs funded by cigarette taxes failed, mostly because all of the tax money ended up being shifted to fill holes in funding for other programs

Answer 1

No, your not.

Answer 2

President Bush vetoed a bill which grow to be purely the slender end of the Dems wedge of socialized drugs. If the socialists (er, I mean liberals) surely need to help young ones and not in basic terms play political video games for the clicking they could draft a bill that addresses the subject of uninsured babies without including political beef, grandstanding ( spelled L Y I N G )for the media, or attempting to rigidity socialized drugs down our throats. For the checklist, I DO have faith that everyone babies could be medically insured. I do purely not think of that socialism is the respond.

Answer 3

yes you are! Agreeing with a retard doesn't make you look very smart. Everyone has there own poison, why pick on the smokers? You have too many drinks, you can kill someone with your car. Smoking too many cigarttes and driving doesn't. Duh! Get it?
I am betting you are not a smoker! Let's start raising alcohol taxes.

Answer 4

just because it happpened on a state level, doesnt mean it will happen on a federal level.

many more checks and balances on the federal level.

Also, not fair to assume that just because a cig tax didnt work in the past, in YOUR state, that it wouldnt work now - in other states.

Side note: more often than not... if you agree with bush - dont.

Answer 5

I agree with you, the money would shrink as people smoked less.

Answer 6

No.