Hillary will on CNN tomorrow.
2007-10-03 16:16:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by DesignDiva1 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before angry voters restore Republicans to power -- in the name of "tea party populism" -- perhaps they should consider just how well right-wing rule worked out for them during the past decade. A Census Bureau study found that real median household income had declined from $52,500 in 2000, the last year that Bill Clinton was president, to $50,303 in 2008, George W. Bush's final year -- a period during which Republicans dominated Congress as well. So most of those middle-class Americans who flock to the tea party demonstrations were big losers during the Bush era. So who were the winners? According to David Cay Johnston, America's premier tax journalist, newly released IRS data shows that the country's very wealthiest citizens -- the top 400 -- marked enormous income gains while paying less and less in taxes. For purposes of comparison, Johnston notes that the bottom 90 percent of Americans saw their incomes rise by only 13 percent in 2009 dollars, compared with a 399 percent increase for the top 400. In a single year, between 2006 and 2007, the income of those top 400 taxpayers rose by 31 percent -- from an average of $263.3 million to an average of $344.8 million per year. Meanwhile, Johnston writes, "Their effective income tax rate fell to 16.62 percent, down more than half a percentage point from 17.17 percent in 2006, the new data show." Johnston's data comes from the latest edition of an annual IRS study of the top 400 taxpayers, which was first made public during the Clinton presidency. When Bush became president, unsurprisingly, he curtailed public access to the top 400 report for eight years. The Obama administration has made the report available this year, but such embarrassing statistics will no doubt be buried again as soon as the Republicans return to power.
2016-05-20 03:49:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wish people would realize that family values conservatives have hijacked the republican party and has driven it into the ground....and the country into huge debt.
Bushbots....that's a good one!
2007-10-04 17:54:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by tanzer360 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nothing would compare to the world wide damage that Bush has inflicted on the world by invading Iraq.
2007-10-03 14:01:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by huffyb 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Bush's mother should be blamed for keeping the afterbirth, oh wait! Maybe the afterbirth would have been smarter!
2007-10-03 13:58:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by cprucka 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
They are too busy picking on Rush limbaugh at the moment but once they catch their breathe I'm sure they'll be all over it.
2007-10-03 14:04:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. They will blame him for Bush's war and many more things. Lets hold him accoutable for what he actually has done.
2007-10-03 14:02:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
they still have not accepted the fact that he lied about iraq.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6271335807577452397&q=box+bush&total=594&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
2007-10-03 14:04:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Right after they are done blaming him for a car accident that happens in Tokyo.
2007-10-03 13:56:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
uh... never. But the real question is, when will Wolf Blitzer blame it on terrorism?
2007-10-03 13:56:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋