For a simple quadratic equation, let's say in standard for is simply
ax^2+bx+c=0. Why cannot this be rearranged to solve for a, b , or c
when you have 2 values such as "a" and "b", "a" and "c", or "b"
and "c".
Why doesn't the equation hold true when you are trying to rearrange
to solve for missing variables?!
x= -b+- sqrt b^2-4ac / 2a that is for solving x
Why doesn't it hold true if you do the following for other
variables:
To solve for b: b= -ax^2+c / x
To solve for a: bx+c / x^2
to solve for c: c= -ax^2-bx
2007-10-03
13:32:37
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Mathematics
Say if your given the zeroes and one variable, could the original
equation be rearranged into an new equation to solve for that
particular variable, sortof what I did above. Why is it that you
need the zeros. What is the minimum amount of information you could
be given to solve for missing variables and what situations are
their that you can use to solve for missing variables. ( i.e, your
given one zero and the vertex, solve for the other zero and solve
for the "a" value in the equation, or your given the zeros and the y-
value of the vertex, find the equation of the parabola). What is the
minimum set of points given to get an equation for a quadratic?
2007-10-03
13:32:47 ·
update #1
explain thouroughly please, with examples, thanks.
2007-10-03
13:37:21 ·
update #2
I am wondering same for the linear equation f(x)=mx+b
why can't it be rearranged to solve for x :
x= -b/m, or for b: b=-mx, or m= -b/x
2007-10-03
13:58:08 ·
update #3