keyshawn isnt that bad
2007-10-03 11:45:05 · 5 answers · asked by Madmen22 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I definitely do. Michael Irvin seemed to me to bemore of a loudmouth with nothing to offer as opposed to being a former football star with thoughtful insight. He was skilled at being a screaming potstirrer (football's answer to Stephen A. Smith) than someone who can be an objective commentator. Plus, I've never really cared for Irvin because he was a clown off the field. Now Keyshawn Johnson (someone who I do respect, because he seems to be the type who could end up being a coach down the line) is the anti-Irvin, offering a mix of insight and opinion. It's about time ESPN did something right.
2007-10-03 11:56:16 · answer #1 · answered by Snoop 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Michael Irvin is one of the loudest, most obnoxious guys on TV and he makes Keyshawn look like a soft-spoken philosopher. Despite Irvin's big smile, he puts me on edge, and I'm glad he's gone. Football analysis should be about thoughtful insight with SOME fun and games but not to the point where you become a gigantic, boisterous clown like Irvin with no respect for your fellow commentators.
2007-10-03 18:56:54 · answer #2 · answered by abdiver12 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irvin was a guy who thought he had something to say ,but didn't,kind of like Chris Berman. His laughing and giggling were annoying to the point of being sickening. Now if they would just get rid of that gasbag Berman , the show might be watchable.
2007-10-03 22:43:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea keyshawn aint that bad but why did he retire he was fine a year ago with the panthers.i agree now its more quiet
2007-10-03 19:03:55 · answer #4 · answered by Logan H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, its much more professional now.
2007-10-03 18:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by The Claymaker- Go Pack! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋