No, or put on a condom? absolute destruction for the progress of hiv, any one agree?
2007-10-03 10:22:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Being as women are the child bearers, not gays
2007-10-03 10:26:23 · update #1
well ok you guys, what is the answer cos it spreading like wildfire in gb, sitting back and ignoring it is not the answer
2007-10-03 10:51:26 · update #2
If people didn't share needles, and only had sex in marriage, this would be the best way to stop it.
2007-10-03 13:26:57 · answer #1 · answered by RB 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"absolute destruction for the progress of hiv"? Except that its not "absolute"...no condom is guaranteed 100% protection against anything.
Of course, women could "absolutely" refuse to have sex with any guy who insists on not wearing one...but thats never going to happen either.
2007-10-03 10:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you think about this before you posted it? What about drug users, gay men, people infected from blood transfusions? Granted the latter has a strict screening program now, but that dosnt mean it will never happen again.
2007-10-03 10:46:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condoms and the treatment of yeast infections which are very common and natural in females and cause minute sores which in turn increase infection rates.
2007-10-03 10:31:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mrs. Midnightbully 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, since it was first seen in homosexuals, so I dont think that follows.
Although, if you could convince people in Africa of the need for condoms, I would be impressed.
2007-10-03 10:25:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it lies with everyone!! What about gay men? They don't touch women in that way and yet they're still susceptible.
2007-10-03 10:25:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Even if women don;t pass it on, it will still pass on intergenerationally through sex and IV drug use.
2007-10-03 10:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by Blade_III 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...its not that easy!
what about blood donors in 3rd world countries without proper screening.
or drug addicts sharing needles.
2007-10-03 10:25:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No cause drug users will still transfer, as will gay men.
2007-10-03 10:25:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. Its past by drug addicts and men having sex with men, as well as by heterosexual sex.
2007-10-03 10:28:20 · answer #10 · answered by chris h 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋