Why not allow them to break it on their own or permit them to leave for their final reserved abode. This question is being asked because it has become a routine affair in India.
2007-10-03 10:14:12 · 5 answers · asked by Nimit 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
if the person fasting is a mentally capable ADULT and they are acting on their own accord and not being coerced then let them go. The government should not interfere.
2007-10-03 10:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by dances with cats 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because fasting till death is started by Gandhi. The cause may be good or bad. Government should respond to the resistance.
2007-10-03 20:44:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some people hae a following ,th eperson undertaking the fast knws that hios /her followers would destroy public properties if some thing happens to him.they undertake fast onoly because of his .that is why they do it afer announcement .ait is a fraudulent tactics.No man does it without announcement if he wants to create an impression on the society that he proposes to die .for a cause . he has a huge benefit to reap .those who really die for thepeole goiunnoticed and uncared for .
2007-10-03 12:51:33 · answer #3 · answered by Infinity 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If John Hagee wants to fast to death (which will take about ten years), I wouldn't want interference.
2007-10-03 10:17:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
forget the political correctness, let them die, BUT if they have murdered/raped and tortured a person, keep them live. death is to good for them, let them suffer
2007-10-03 10:34:45 · answer #5 · answered by valda54 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋