I think the mets should trade maybe Jose Reyes for Johan Santana. Mets should keep D.Wright,C.Beltran,O.Perez,J.Maine, and that is really all (maybe some of the young guys that they just brought up,) they should staYY!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-03
08:49:20
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Sports
➔ Baseball
I only think that Reyes should get traded maybe if he has a bad year next year.
And another great lead-off hitter is Jimmy Rollins!!
2007-10-04
09:01:00 ·
update #1
I see the people saying Reyes is the best leadoff hitter. How about Jimmy Rollins? Rollins is the better player all around at shortstop in the NL.
2007-10-03 09:09:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tommy R 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, I'd be loathe to trade him, as he is young, has tremendous talent and a good contract. However, his reversion to is prior habits was alarming. I don't know how much was Rickey's fault, but by the end of the year, he wasn't even the second-best shortstop in the NL East. The Mets have to decide if they're willing to gamble that he'll turn it around, and, if they trade him, who do they replace him with? The Twins should be happy to do the deal, as Reyes has a couple of years left on the relatively cheap contract he signed, and they know they'll never be able to keep Santana after next year. Of course, the Mets shouldn't do it unless Santana signs a new deal first. At this point, I'd do it. Young ace pitchers are harder to come by than leadoff hitters and shortstops.
2007-10-03 09:41:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question has come up earlier today and my answer will be the same. The Twins would love to be able to keep Santana but they might not be able to offer him the money he is looking for. If the Twins can't afford Santana than how in the world can they afford to sign someone like Reyes to a long term contract? It is not as simple as you make it out to be and blockbuster deals like the one you are suggesting seldom occur.
2007-10-03 08:56:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i hope ur kidding about reyes guy has one bad month at the end of the season and u want him out i dare u to name 2 better lead off hitters int eh game right now i hope ur not a mets fan cause if u r im ashamed to like the same team as u reyes is the man we have enough money and young prospects to make some moves but trade reyes ur friggen nuts man
2007-10-03 09:01:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
trading Reyes off a down year would be a big mistake.who would be the lead off hitter and SS for the mets?i think part of Reyes downfall in the second half was willie never gave him rest.i think the kid was burnt out.
2007-10-03 08:59:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by mojo569 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Jose Reyes isn't going anywhere. He is young and needs to be "better coached" I think you will see a new man next season.
Milledge, however, has to go; and I believe he'll be packaged with Heilman and maybe Humber. Their first priority is a #1 starter, and this year, I think Omar gets his man.
2007-10-03 10:11:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by samdugan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would hate to see Reyes go, but if we could get Santana for him, I would do it in a heartbeat. You can always get good hitting, but you can't always get great pitching.
2007-10-03 08:54:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
jose reyes is nothing more than a young luis castillo, he cant hit for power ad all he does is steal bases. He choked when the team neaded him.
2007-10-03 09:03:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by texasman75147 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
get rid of jose reyes the best leadoff man in the majors??? was that a joke? he just had a late season slump.
2007-10-03 08:52:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
as good as that commerce would be (for the Mets besides, the Blue Jays would in truth shoot themselves interior the foot in the event that they went by using with this commerce) that's going to by no ability take place. till the mets grant Johan Santana (that still will by no ability take place) the Jays would by no ability deliver Halladay to manhattan(Mets).
2016-10-20 22:25:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋