and I dont expect you to agree with me. But enough with the Diana conspiracy theories already.
Do you think if you thought someone was trying to kill you by faking a car accident you might have put your seatbelt on?
I admit I think the Royal family are totally outdated concept and am frankly embarassed at the bowing and scraping. Doesnt mean I wish them dead, of course I dont', I don't wish anyone dead. I think we need to move one from the sovereignty idea but I digress.
So my question is: Diana - no seatbelt died in a car wreck that should may have survived if she wore one. Therefore unless MI6 or 5 removed her seatbelt it had to be an accident and we should leave it be and get over it. Yes or no?
2007-10-03
08:26:16
·
28 answers
·
asked by
Ice Queen
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
**everyone I know wears seatbelts in back seat. Its law in the UK which is where she was from.
As for proving the seatbelts were there...are you serious? Are you suggesting with the amount of security that surrounded this woman, no one noticed MI5 had removed her seatbelt. Or would allow her to be a passenger in a car that had no rear setabelts?Paranoia at its absolute worst and the precise reason this ridiculousness continues.
2007-10-03
08:36:14 ·
update #1
Great Escape, there is nothing wrong with my spelling or grammar. Stop trying to be a smart **** and add something to the debate instead of trying to be a smug superior ****. By the way you succeeded admirably in at least part of your goal.
2007-10-03
08:45:10 ·
update #2
Michigan - she should have put her seatbelt on, all conspiracy theories fall down on that. If she had it on she would have stood chance of surviving.
Its sad she died of course, mothers of children are dying every day. Look at Iraq. Are you telling me that isnt a crime?
2007-10-04
05:07:12 ·
update #3
The problem Michigan is that this has been investigated, by the French in whose country it happened. Now its being investigated again. Maybe once this is over people will aceept the thing was an accident she may have survived if she wore her belt. Suspicious? Well that to me is not a mystery.
2007-10-04
06:39:41 ·
update #4
I think conspiracy theorists need to get real lives no matter where they live.
2007-10-03 08:28:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree 100 percent. The was no conspiracy, no murder, she didn't fake her own death. It was an ACCIDENT made worse by the fact that no one was wearing a seat belt. If you believed all the conspiracy theorists then Diana lives at a secret location with all the other dead celebs who no one wants to believe are actually dead. You know, Elvis, Marilyn. JFK etc. I wish for the sake of her 2 sons that the world would accept that a tragedy occurred, respect the memory of the princess and leave those poor boys in peace.
2007-10-03 08:36:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I saw one of the other answers and let me tell you, I just finished reading the Diana Chronicles and it was very in-depth and enlightening. Diana did not drink at all or use drugs. She was not drunk at the time of the accident. And the royal family was very much sick of her antics (i.e. not being a subordinate wench to Prince Charles) and pretty much disobeying every ridiculous "rule" the "Family" expected her to abide by. I am a Diana fan, and I believe the investigation should continue. Crimes without punishment? I don't think so. If there was a crime, it indeed needs to be punished. Remember, detox yourself from her celeberity persona and realize she was a mother and a human being and why should she be in a grave and let rest if there was a crime committed?
HOW ABOUT THIS: WHY DON'T YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE LET IT BE UP TO HER SONS IF THE INVESTIGATION SHOULD CONTINUE. YOU ARE NOT HER FAMILY ARE YOU!?
2007-10-04 05:03:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think if it was not for some of the conflicting stories, this would have been finished with years ago. Trouble is as mentioned earlier in one of the other answers about Dr David Kelly, there are lies, or should i say mistruths. If they just give you the facts, and as we will see in this inquest, different experts different opinions and results. I hope when it is all over then the press will leave it all alone and move on
2007-10-03 08:44:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Glenn M 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i personaly think it was a combination of trying to get away from the camera men chasing them on motorbikes, the driver losing controle and Diana not wearing a seat belt. its sad for everyone who liked her and deastating for her family BUT!! like you, i wish they would shut up about it and move on. the only thing that should be brought to light is the question of the media being allowed to hound people in their private lives to the extent of dangerouse and agressive driving. every one is losing track of the proberbility that the media 'in the form of those idiots chasing the car', are the actual murderers of Diana.but no one in this country seems interested in facts. just their sad little conspiracy theories.
2007-10-03 09:09:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Henri Paul was in the front wearing one didn't do him much good did it.Conspiracy theories come about because people question things.Like why wasn't Saddam Hussein dealt with in 1991?Why did all these countries arm them and train them and then decide to take it away?Is it about terrorists or oil and greed?
2007-10-03 08:42:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by golden 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I wish everyone would just let the poor woman rest in peace. She's been dead for 10 years, after all.
2007-10-03 20:57:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by champer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
this mystery goes way too deep, just like the alleged suicide of Dr Kelly ( i think that was his name) the man involved in the war in Iraq situation. whatever happened, it needs to put to rest because if there was a conspiracy, it will always be kept a secret. in a few hundred years time, this unsolved mystery will be studied as part of history in schools. and even then, no-one will be any the wiser.
2007-10-03 08:34:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes yes yes. Finlay some one who asks the same question i did.. and guess what your correct.
even if the entire story is lies we will never get the truth. and El Fyiad ( forgive spelling) will never get a court to say the royal family killed her.. what a wast of time . im sorry she is dead but she is and let the situation and the memories die too
2007-10-03 08:34:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nobody will ever know the truth and the Inquest is a waste of tax payers money. There are a lot of suspicious aspects of this case and if it hadn't been a car crash I am sure it would have been something else.
2007-10-03 10:05:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by flint 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes!!!
It's the media that keeps raising the question. Especially in the 10th anniversary of her death. Let her rest in peace and her sons move on!
The monarchy is symbolic anyway... so to me it's no big deal, they are just people like me who put their pants on, one leg at a time...
2007-10-03 08:31:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋