2007-10-03 08:16:08 · 9 answers · asked by Ron L 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
lol, dats funni
2007-10-03 10:17:19 · answer #1 · answered by but... iluvhertoo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You left this question open to more questions. If I were rich and in good health but was a moral degenerate, what good would all that money do me as a human being and a damned soul? If on the other hand I was poor and sick, and of high moral standards, I know I would choose to be the sick and poor one. You can't take it with you, you know!
2007-10-03 15:32:29 · answer #2 · answered by hohner57 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh?
Did you mix it up? Did you mean rich and in poor health, or poor and healthy? Your question as it is doesn't make sense. Is it better to have it all, or none at all?
2007-10-03 15:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by catsovermen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummm that's a dumb question....it would of made more sense to ask if it would be better; rich @ in poor health or poor and in good health....don't ya think?!?!
2007-10-03 15:25:18 · answer #4 · answered by Colts girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't quite understand the point of this question, but Rich and healthy would be the choice everytime..
2007-10-03 15:24:16 · answer #5 · answered by n_maritz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm deffinitly rich and helthy
2007-10-03 15:23:36 · answer #6 · answered by white_ninja_12 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhhh... I think you messed up this question. But, if you didn't, I vote for healthy and rich.
2007-10-03 15:24:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's better to be rich, healthy or not.
2007-10-03 16:49:49 · answer #8 · answered by essentiallysolo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being positive is always good. isn't it?
2007-10-03 16:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋