Why does Bush get blamed?

Question

For ignorant people popping out kids that they cannot afford?

Answer 1

Because they are Republicans. That's what he gets for supporting abstinence only education in schools.

Answer 2

Blaming Bush is now the national past time. Having a lot of kids is the lack of responsibility of the parents not the president.

Answer 3

Ignorance!

Answer 4

Sway:

My argument is that the increases to the SCHIP program for the next 5 years are a drop in the bucket compared to the 30% increase in costs that Bush wants to use for the war in Iraq next year.

Also, Bush could have veto'ed the all the GOP spending bills (2002-2006) in which 14,000 riders for $25 billion in pork barrel politics were given to him, but didn't.

So why is he lamely trying to act like a fiscal conservative now, 7 years into his presidency?

The cat is already out of the bag and down the street at this point.

Bush is going to lose poll rating points over this stunt. Rating points that neither Bush nor the GOP can afford to lose with the 08 elections looming.

Answer 5

He's not getting blamed for, as you so ignorantly call, "ignorant" people popping out kids they can't afford, he's getting alot of blame for the way he handles situations, from the war, all the way to health care. It's not the child/ren's fault, nor the parent's faults, for the way this country is falling apart, that the economy sucks right now, it's our lame, IGNORANT current white house resident, aka the president, that caused this mess & is now turning his back on one of society's needier (and there are many) people...if we could have the money he wants/demands to have to fund his "war", we could do a lot more good here at home.

Answer 6

First of all Bush is no Republican.
He's a mouthpiece for big business, they got *their guy* in.
Look at Republican philosophies then look at Bush, apples and oranges.
People need to realise that this is *OUR* money! Not the "govt's."
"The government" doesn't have *any* money it's The People's money!
I'd much rather my money be spent in this country instead of it being spent on "Nation Building" in Iraq, Afganistan and other countries!
I am TOTALLY against any type of "foreign aid!"
Our bridges collapse and Bush wants to build bridges in foreign countries?
This is insanity!
A Republican

Answer 7

Bush and his type have gotten abstinence only sexual education passed in many areas. Theyve managed to discourage abortions while keeping them legal. Theyve pushed to drop proper financial education in schools. Theyve helped get home econ classes dropped. He's not necessarily to blame, but as the representation of the party and the highest example of someone who pushes those ideals his shares a portion of it.

Conservative gov't policies keep people in their place by not offering them the education they need to get out of it.

Liberal gov't policies keep people in their place by making it easier to live off the gov't than to rise up and do something.

Bush is to blame as much as all other politicians are, which is quite a bit. Yes, the people are to blame, but if you never teach a person to be self-sufficient, how are they supposed to know? You assume their parents will teach them, but how many of their parents actually know how to survive on their own, much less thrive? You cant teach what you dont know, and its very hard to learn something that no one wants to teach you.

Answer 8

Kids should have the oppurtunity to be good, productive citizens...American success stories...NO MATTER if the child's conception was a mistake.

When Bush asks for 50 billion to fight a pointless war...but vetoes continued (vastly cheaper than 50 billion ) efforts by the Dems to provide some kids with that AMERICAN oppurtunity....He is ABSOLUTELY to blame.

Answer 9

Same reason he gets blamed for ignorant people defrauding their mortgage lenders.....

IF YOU RENTED IN N.O., YOU DIDN'T "LOSE EVERYTHING" - YOUR LANDLORD DID.

IF YOU OWNED A HOME THAT GOT FLOODED OUT AND ARE TRYING TO RECOVER ON YOUR HOMEOWNER POLICY BECAUSE YOU DID NOT HAVE FLOOD INSURANCE, YOU BROKE THE LAW, YOU DEFRAUDED YOUR BANK.

FEDERAL LAW HAS FOR MANY YEARS REQUIRED MORTGAGE LENDERS TO OBTAIN PROOF OF FLOOD INSURANCE BEFORE LENDING AGAINST PROPERTIES IN FLOOD ZONES (AND PROPERTIES 12 FEET BELOW SEA LEVEL ARE IN FLOOD ZONES).

THE PENALTIES FOR NOT GETTING THAT PROOF ARE SEVERE.

IT'S DOUBTFUL THAT THE BANKS JUST DECIDED NOT TO OBTAIN PROOF.

THE HOMEOWNERS EITHER FORCED DOCUMENTS OR, MORE LIKELY, HAD FLOOD INSURANCE WHEN THEY GOT THE MORTGAGE AND THEN DIDN'T RENEW THE POLICIES.

YET BUSH GAVE THEM $2K EACH - WHICH THEY PROMPTLY SPENT ON HOOKERS AND BOOZE BUT THEN HE'S SUPPOSEDLY THIS HEARTLESS BASTARD FOR NOT GIVING THEM MORE OF OUR MONEY.

YOU CANNOT WIN WITH THESE FOLKS, NOTHING IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR THEM, SO LET'S CUT OUR LOSSES AND HAVE NO FREEBIES FOR ANYONE!!!!

Gotta love the "the country is falling apart" answer - we have very low unemployment, very low inflation, at the peak of the interest rate cycle - that's not falling apart folks. If you're not doing well now, you're either a paraplegic or you're just not trying - or you're a new entrant to the job market - a 20-something or immigrant. And that's WHY most poor people are young and/or immigrants.

Answer 10

As frequently is the case in American politics (the dumb-down version), a dichotomy is regularly time-honored interior the minds of people who prescribe to the mainstream media's attitude. in case you're in help of one occasion, then you certainly could be vehemently destructive to something that has to do with the different occasion in accordance to the yank political philosophy at present. And so, Bush blamed Clinton as Obama blamed Bush, yet no one cites this as being incorrect until you're against whoever is presently elected. replaced into Bush an abysmal failure? incredibly, and that's coming from somebody who loathes Obama and thinks he has finished a unfavorable job as president. Blame is rightfully attributed to Bush, who took a sturdy united states in 2000 and left it 2d to the great melancholy in 2008 (with 2 perpetual wars and a crippled shape besides). in spite of the undeniable fact that, as stated the blame game would not do lots to easily alleviate the topics we now face, which no quantity of speaking is going to repair at this factor. Our financial gadget has particularly lots hit severe mass, issues are particularly lots as screwed up as they'd desire to be so as to set off a series reaction which reasons a melancholy the likes of which has in no way been considered earlier (anticipate it for the period of the 2010s for beneficial). we are nonetheless making outrageous commitments to Afghanistan, even nonetheless that place is only going to coach out the same way it did whilst the Russians left. whilst it is going to become too severe priced to habit a conflict without authentic, tangible targets or recommendations that are no longer self-perpetuating (we will kill them, inflicting greater of them to hate and combat us, giving us greater enemies to kill, etc.) we will pullout and then there will be a vie for skill only like there replaced into interior the early 90s until the Taliban got here out on authentic. regardless of those aforementioned issues happening, Obama and his administration is enjoying it off to the yank human beings as though there is a few mild on the top of the tunnel, whilst quite they're in basic terms feeding the yank human beings the same scrambled fable that the Bush administration could no longer unload adequate of. the yank human beings have a top to blame themselves for electing those Republican and Democratic saboteurs to public place of work interior the 1st place, elected officers have little to blame earlier them, because of fact they ran for a place that's meant to be based on service, compromise, and fixing issues; no longer self-service, partisan standstills, and making issues worse.

Answer 11

I don't know why blaming Bush.. I feel bad for them.