A well-known newspaper reporter has written several books on events in the Middle East and the impact of globalization. He would be a good source of information for a report on the problems in the Middle East because
A. The reporter avoids references to other sources of information.
B. The reporter has a reputation for being a good writer.
C. Other writers have disputed his books.
D. The reporter is biased against Islam
2007-10-03 07:28:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
What the hell kind of question is that. Well lets break it down:
It can't be A because there is no mention of who he references.
It can't be B because the information says he is "well-known" but it does not mention whether he is "well-known" to be a good writer. Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, is "well-known" but I'm not sure that anyone would consider it to be a good source of information.
It can't be C because the information given makes no mention of other writers or disputes about his books.
It can't be D because there is no mention of that either.
This is a very poor question, with no real answer. I'd say that B is the best answer, but its still technically wrong. "Well-known" doesn't mean "good."
2007-10-03 07:39:54 · answer #1 · answered by null 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B. Tough one though. There is nothing in the question to give you information about either A, C or D. If he is a "well-known newspaper reporter" and has written several books I assume that they think this is enough to qualify him to be classified as a "good" writer.
2007-10-03 07:45:16 · answer #2 · answered by ljg423 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot something of the e-mail and all of it finally ends up with almost if no longer each tragic historic journey interior the U.S. being brought about by ability of Islamic male terrorists between the a while of 17 and 40.
2016-10-06 01:03:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A
of course it is A, if he wrote several books, then he has references. why would the fact that he as a reputation of being a good writer mean that he will be a good resource. he is a good writer....because of the resources...otherwise he would be a poor writer.....duh!
2007-10-03 07:32:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Should be B as per logical reasoning
2007-10-03 07:33:24 · answer #5 · answered by Kahuna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B
2007-10-03 07:36:29 · answer #6 · answered by Sophie B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋