2007-10-03 05:47:07 · 11 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not with their own party. But they're to busy bashing the WHOLE armed forces, not the few actual dishonest troops that Rush called out.
It your typical political double standard.
2007-10-03 06:37:44 · answer #1 · answered by qwiktruk 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Does it really matter if they would or not? Liberals complain about Limbaugh and others like him. Conservatives complain about media bias. Moderates complain about everyone else complaining. In short there is just too much complaining about something that isn't going to change. The fact is that we do have free speech in this country and nobody seems to be real worried about credibility or hypocrisy in general so long as they get to put their two cents in about what is being said.
The thing I have always found amusing about this subject is this. The people who listen to Rush Limbaugh daily apparently like what he is saying. This is why he is able to remain on radio year after year with such a large audience. The complaining about what he is saying is not going to change this opinion in his fans. People who don't listen to Limbaugh couldn't care less what he says. It doesn't spur mass protests. It doesn't spur rancorous calls for his removal from the airways. It doesn't prevent advertisers from sponsoring his show. So what it becomes is just a matter self gratifying whining and preaching to choir so to speak.
2007-10-03 07:27:46 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course you and Shane thoroughly ignored the factor of Limbaugh's assertion. As do many others here. i do no longer pay attention to the coach, yet after analyzing your assertion, i do no longer see "hate speech". I see him declaring the unfairness of the disgusting mainstream media and the underhanded strategies of agencies like the ACLU, and so on. i'm happy those sailors are living house risk-free and sound, and that i help the movements taken, yet once you do no longer think of there could have been an outcry of foul play had this occurred below Bush or yet another Republican President, then you somewhat are actually not being elementary with us or your self. yet in this political climate curiously that any one that doesn't trust liberal democrat dogma is to blame of hate speech or worse yet-racism.
2016-12-14 06:36:19 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on now, you know that the only free speech they agree to is their own and to hell with anyone else getting their free speech. It's seen on this board all the time.
2007-10-03 07:54:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ah, Imus gets fired, Rush does worse everyday and gets a pass. To answer your question, you can't gain credibility for supporting someone with NO credibility.
2007-10-03 07:10:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I do not think that US Taxpayers be forced to pay to have Rush Limbaugh broadcast on the Armed Forces Radio Network.
2007-10-03 07:05:57 · answer #6 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hey Rush is right. When I served there were alot of whiners and complainers...always will be...that's life.
2007-10-03 07:16:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about the free speech of the people at moveon.org or anyone else who speaks out against this administration or the war???
They should also be entitled to free speech!
Rush can have his if they can have theirs!
2007-10-03 06:10:16 · answer #8 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
ONLY IF THEY BREAK FROM THE LIBERAL HARD LINE !!!!! Otherwise, even the most intelligent liberal, is not allowed to speak favorably of anyone, anything, anywhere, anyhow, etc. concerning the right !!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-03 09:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rush can say whatever he wants. It doesn't mean the world has to agree with him.
2007-10-03 06:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋