It was posted without any name calling, etc. apparently someone deleted it because they did not like the factual content which in part listed her quotes when she denigrated various Secret Service agents, her views on how socialistic she wants our society to be, an insight into how she views her "friends" as basically sacrificial lambs, and the numerous (upwards of 75) murders and mysterious deaths linked to her while in Arkansas and in the White House.
Once again proving the liberal mindset, that it is necessary to silence the opposition rather than have a free and open exchange of ideas. It's really sad, but the truth carries on because these facts are starting to circulate again via email and
printed versions of these events.
What's your opinion about people who, when they dislike a fact, they feel the need to obliterate it from existence? Is this just another typical liberal in action here on YA?
2007-10-03 05:25:25 · 15 answers · asked by Wayne G 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As you can see, the typical liberal response, when you disagree with a fact: 1. Get it deleted and make believe it doesn't exist and, 2. Just claim that it's not true. - So sad and typical. If the statements are patently false, it would serve us all the better that they be left up there so we can all make up our own minds about them and then see them for what they are. The problem is the libs need to sweep the truth under a carpet because when the truth comes out about these people, they scratch and claw like little girls. If you disagree with the information, post your disagreement. Don't erase a well formulated response just because you disagree with it. That's reasonable, right?
2007-10-03 05:41:13 · update #1
You must have a different definition of "fact" than most dictionaries. You see, the Clinton "death list" has been debunked so thoroughly it isn't even funny any more, and most of the quotes you mention are either out of context, incomplete or simply fabricated. If you want to participate in a free and open exchange of ideas, it is incumbent upon you to do so fairly, rather than making up facts to support your case.
2007-10-03 05:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I have found that when someone posts a genuine, honest and factual answer or question that cannot be refuted by logic or the ever present talking points frustration sets in. Instead of taking those points and actually considering their validity these people chose to silence or ignore the facts. This of course is in direct opposition to the labels in which we know or they choose to call themselves, liberal or progressive. Those labels having the connotation of open mindedness which is just not the case. I say that we should move to secure a new label for them. One that actually fits and is not deceptive when trying to express the true nature of these people.
2007-10-03 07:20:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
While I have not read the transcripts of those comments from Hillary, I do know that many of the accusations levied against her are accurate and factual.
The fact that these types of answers with facts about this criminal are deleted is not surprising. The liberal left and YA! have attempted to surpress facts of things that hurt most of the liberal democrat candidates for president while anything derogatory about any conservative is allowed and promoted.
For further evidence, look at what these liberals are doing about the Rush comments. Totally wrong and inaccurate. I was actually listening to the show when he made the comments that have been twisted and manipulated for liberal agendas.
Just remember, the liberal democrats are not for personal freedoms. They are socialists and our first amendment will be abolished if they are elected.
Be afraid, very afraid.
2007-10-03 05:37:19 · answer #3 · answered by Michael H 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Liberalism can simply not exist in a soctiety of free thinkers.
Free thinking will lead to and is a expression of Liberty.
That is why socailist individuals want to teach children what to think starting at kindergarten.
Looks what libs did to Rush they took somthing he said and lied about it to distract from the fact they said the same thing a week before.
2007-10-03 05:34:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope, she's somewhat no longer the Antichrist. That man or woman is meant to be a large chief who brings nearly all of the folk of the international mutually. Hillary is a divider.
2016-10-10 05:44:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a trade mark of the libs....they claim that they love freedom of speech, but just try to have an open two way debate with one....they shout you out...they try to humiliate, and if they are powerful enough they will try to destroy you....just look at what is happening to Rush Limbaugh...they've been trying to sneak in the fairness doctrine to silence him but fail every time they try...so now they have to go after him personally and destroy him...want some more Waco's???....vote in a dem to the white house...you'll see some more from the ones who "claim" they are inclusive, caring, and are for the little man.....yeah right.
2007-10-03 05:39:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hell, I've posted five questions today and Yahoo only allowed one to hit post status.
Freedom of speech my azz.
Yahoo probably gets funded by Soros too.
2007-10-03 05:38:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Those aren't "facts". You were just seeing more preposterous lies and slanders from the Karl Rove Lie Machine.
Of course such nonsense might be removed....all that ludicrous talk of "murders" and "socialism"---these are the ravings of a hysterical lunatic.
Personally however I'd leave such slanders up, so that everyone can see what a fool is posting them....just like the silly 9-11 conspiracy theorists, who are now universally laughed at.
people are tired of these preposterous lies about Hilary...they are so wild and fantastical, they serve only to label the poster for what they are.
2007-10-03 05:32:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Sadly, in some instances. Yes!
2007-10-03 05:31:26 · answer #9 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Heavy Sigh, if there is one place in all the universe where truth does not circulate, it is in forwarded e-mail chains.
Normally truth will set you free, but for this asker, the truth will set him off.
2007-10-03 05:33:40 · answer #10 · answered by jehen 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋