I've been saying for awhile that he would. I think that the nations of the U.S.A.beleaguered world should declare the Americas military a terrorist faction!
Seriously though if your terrorist leader decides to do that The democratically controlled congress should grow the balls to cut military funding.
if he wants to war with the world then they have the respnsibility to snip the war mongering purse strings!
2007-10-03 02:45:51 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No I'm obviously not Iranian but I am a concerned
Citizen of the world that the US for some reason is so determined to go to war with.
2007-10-03 02:56:18 · update #1
It seems Congress themselves have sort of beat the president to the punch when trying to lay the foundation for building a case against Iran by designating Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a "terrorist" organization.
http://www.alternet.org/audits/64067/
Most Americans are actually unhappy with Bush. Unfortunately, cutting funding does nothing to force change within the White House as they are determined to continue its "stay the course" policy as it sees fit, regardless of what measures Congress takes or how the American public reacts. Even if Congress wanted to cut funding, there aren't enough votes to do so.
An attack on Iran is not necessarily inevitable, but with the rhetoric being spewed from both neoconservative hawks and AIPAC on one side and the Iranian hardline regime on the other, it seems more likely. It would not matter if the findings of the IAEA determined Iran to be "in compliance" with international standards, some within the US gov't will find ANY excuse to use military force.
2007-10-03 03:09:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
George W. Bush doesn't want war with Iran. He wants war with the President of Iran. Most of the Iranians are just like the Iraqis. They are being controlled by a dictator. The President of Iran is just like Saddam Hussein. He may not be as psychotic as Saddam Hussein was, but he is still a brutal dictator. There are photos of him kidnapping people and having them executed. He says he wants nuclear energy, but he is surrounded by oil. He doesn't need nuclear energy. He wants to make a nuclear bomb. It isn't just George W. Bush that thinks something needs to be done about him. Take a look at the results at VOTE.COM. Most of the people that voted there think something needs to be done about the President of Iran. The U.N. will continue to pose sanctions against Iran. There aren't that many people in the world that want the President of Iran controlling the Middle East with nuclear weapons.
2007-10-03 20:35:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe,as some, that because you cut funding "for the war" that the troops are left behind with no way out..Is not the Navy,Air Force,Army Air,Marine Air, etc, Which will be very active in the with-drawal procedures not still on the payroll,or would you believe that ALL military funding is associated with the Iraqi conflict ?I think I'll ask Harry Reid......Oh! Wait ! I doubt he'll know either.....
2007-10-03 02:57:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
this is going to be the kind of substitute from our present day President of Peace. I assume the anti-conflict circulation will magically re-look whilst Romney takes workplace. Liberals in elementary terms protest conflict whilst there's a Republican interior the White abode. it fairly is glaring.
2016-11-07 03:34:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will be quite unfortunate if President Bush wages a war with Iran. He should please be told to leave the White House with a legacy of an American nation living peacefully with all nations of the world.
2007-10-03 03:13:41 · answer #5 · answered by bashkanoyola 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you...well Bush likes to interfere a lot, let him interfere, he went to war apparently to end terrorism and dictatorship, well that seems to be more on the rise, lets not forget the weapons of mass destruction too...i wonder where they are. Bush says god told him to go to war....wow he really must have special powers.
2007-10-03 03:12:22 · answer #6 · answered by LOTR Fan 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What congress should do and what congress will do is the problem. As for the pres., the people who are the ones that voted him in should oust him too. It happens in other countries, why not in the US. Then he be judged by the world court for war crimes against humanity. Etc.
2007-10-03 02:59:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Oh aren't you a smart individual. It is ok for the Iran President to attend Death to Israel rallies and yell out death to Israel, America and England, that is ok in your eyes. But when we want to take him out before that wacko gets nuclear arms and uses them it is wrong and Bush is yet a criminal. You do know Bush has no power to call on anything unless he has approval by congress and other venues, right? You did go through the rest of high school and made it to government class, yes? I mean, I understand liberals of your caliber have a hard time making it through school with a half baked mind.
2007-10-03 02:56:02 · answer #8 · answered by Fallen 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
You, A-jad & Osama (Bin Laden not Barrak), seem to be the only ones who believe this tripe.
I realize that it is hard to understand, but we WILL stand against the terror that you and your ilk seek to bring to the world. There will always be those who see through your diatribes and will stand up to you. Get used to it or back off!
2007-10-03 02:59:34 · answer #9 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Oh, and you have balls? Tell us all where you sit before you tell us where you stand.
You've got to give some credit to that sneaky Ahmadinejad though, If you want to play with the boys you better do it in their backyard and not your own. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
2007-10-03 03:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by Barney 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋