English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

If the original composer is credited, and the unknown person is not being paid {that is actually the main point}, then, in theory, it is ok.

2007-10-03 02:17:50 · answer #1 · answered by Lady Silver Rose * Wolf 7 · 1 0

It may or may not be infringement. it sounds as if this muscian made his own recording, in which case the record label has no claim on infringement. Anyone can make a new recording, copycat recordings are 100 percent legal and are called "covers" in the trade.

However whenever a song is performed, there is a royalty due the composer. Generally this is covered by a payment to ASCAP or BMI which have a regular method for assesing internet play of songs. If this was posted on a reputable site, then the performance royalty was probably covered by the ISP.

2007-10-06 14:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by lare 7 · 0 0

i'm not a musician, yet! i would be happy to critique! I enjoyed Beets are the recent Carrots, inspite of the shown fact that that's fairly the creepy track! @Onehep i in my opinion like a number of your songs! Lo-fi= attraction! @RJ I nevertheless love your stuff, inspite of the shown fact that it scares the sh*t out of me each time I turn it on. @Beni I agree, Grotto Blues grow to be a great song!

2016-10-20 21:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes....

it IS infringement...according the majority of the things that have been happening.. any time you publicly display music that you are not the owner of, you Have to have the rights to the music or get permission to do so.

they would have to apply for rights through the publishing company who administers rights to the music. so, the guy above me is right, but there are steps to be taken...

2007-10-03 02:18:04 · answer #4 · answered by blue-in-groove 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers