Who would win in a head on debate between Ahmedinejad and GWB?

Question

Subject : GWB's War on Islam

Answer 1

Though they are both radical degenerates, in a debate, Ahmedinejad would take out Georgie Boy in less than 5 seconds.

Answer 2

8-Dave hit it right on the head. Ahmedinejad is educated and articulate. He's the puppet of power abusing fanatics--but then, so is Bush.

At least Ahmedinejad can put two coherent sentences together. Bush can't even read his lines convincingly.

True. He didn't actually answer a single question at Columbia. But talking a lot without saying anything is what Pols do. If he hadn't needed a translator he'd have wowed the crowd.

Answer 3

Unfortunately Ahmedinejad has better command of himself than boy George. Added to that is the fact that GW Bush appears every bit as radical as the Iranian leader.

Answer 4

Obama plans to have a $a million billion campaign conflict chest and that i do no longer think of that Herman Cain can advance that variety of money, and jointly as funds would not inevitably win elections it does help the candidate get his message out. Obama is a Harvard psychological and good talker yet Cain is a without delay shooter and that i think of that he might provide Obama somewhat a challenge. i might prefer to work out Herman Cain on the republican value ticket; doubt very plenty in the event that they international positioned him on the desirable of the value ticket yet he could be a stable V.P. determination notwithstanding; this might blunt any calls of racism if Obama did no longer get re-elected. because you recognize that individuals will say it became racism if Obama losses. There are people who already think of that the “Tea celebration” circulate is racist. individually i think of that there is racism on the two facets; some will vote for Obama because of the fact he's black and a few will vote against Obama because of the fact he's black; there is racism on the two facets, however the final public of electorate i think of won't evaluate the applicants pores and skin colour. besides the indisputable fact that i hit upon it particularly humorous that some African human beings are calling Herman Cain and “Uncle Tom” or token candidate because of the fact he's a Republican. Cain struggled plenty extra as a black guy than Obama ever did yet sadly adequate of the racial communicate, and that i desire that race would not improve into too enormous of a component in this election. Regardless, i might particularly prefer to work out Herman Cain on the Republican value ticket.

Answer 5

That is a tough call.

Both are hard-core idealogues who suffer from myopia.

however, I think Ahmendinejad is much more articulate, educated and knowledgeable about the world-stage. Further, he has been highly skilled at posturing his country in the face of the US, Russia, EU, etc...

Bush only operates from dime-store cowboy-mania, and can only rely on oil dependence and religion as reasoning.

Therefore, I'd put my money on Mahmoud, in spite of the fact that both men are puss-filled lesions upon the leagues of lepers they lead.

Answer 6

Well from seeing him beat both Kerry and Gore with their rambling I would say the President would clobber the Hitler of the Middle East Ahmedinejad.

Answer 7

Bush cant even read properly from his own notes so guess

And Ahmadinejad keeps saying wierd things for every question

the Deabte would be Fun

Answer 8

Ahmedinejad can pronounce 'nuclear' properly.

Answer 9

Exxon Mobile.

Answer 10

Ahmedinejad... Though certainly not because he's right (he hardly passes as a slug), but because Bush is the intellectual equivalent of one of the tightly curled turds my dog leaves in the garden.