If Goncalo Amaral made his accusations against the McCanns after lunch alcohol may have played a part in the confused and unproven string of accusations he made against the McCanns. Just look at this guy , he is an "arguido" himself for assaulting another suspect. He is also one of those who grilled the McCanns after lying that he had "proof" that their daughter was "killed by accident" and another string of lies.
2007-10-02 21:24:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
http://www.thisisaberdeen.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=202847&command=displayContent&sourceNode=232187&home=yes&more_nodeId1=148317&contentPK=18332267
2007-10-02 21:25:00 · update #1
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/sunday/2007/09/30/exclusive-disgrace-of-madeline-cop-98487-19870746/
2007-10-02 21:26:27 · update #2
Don't miss this photo:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=485154&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
2007-10-02 21:31:15 · update #3
no no no.. a suspect is going to deflect attention from them self. they are going to try to blame someone else in order to protect them self.
Amaral should never have been allowed to stay in connection with the case in anyway... he is the one they need to be going after. are they are protecting one of their own? at the cost of the McCanns
2007-10-02 21:57:11 · answer #1 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What the Portuguese do or no do is none of our business .Look at our Police do they not accuse innocent people every day ,what about Stockwell Met on trial right now ,the Birmingham 6,the Guilford 4,young lad Bentley hanged and pardoned almost fifty years too late , I could go on and on so
don't knock other Counties
2007-10-03 04:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by TOMMY B 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The answer is no , Goncalo Amaral is the suspect not the McCanns.
The last photo says it all here is another:
2007-10-03 04:39:41 · answer #3 · answered by London Man 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yeah you made a good point.Its not looking good for the portugese police is it?
2007-10-03 05:01:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You shouldn't be talking about something you know nothing about. It just doesn't look good.
2007-10-03 04:40:34 · answer #5 · answered by Maria 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋