I think that the truth about 9/11 is missing.... please share your thoughts.?

Question

Hello. Now...... I have seen a documentry that a man produced in his tornado room under his house. It was never allowed to be screened on TV but I saw it on the internet at 1am one morning, the next morning i went to show my mum and it was blocked my some agency in the USA. The things i saw in this documentry were very scarey and I belived it 99%. I used to work for a fraud squad and im not easily tricket or bullshited to. I wont say anymore as the things and videos, and close ups and rewinds and evidence and civillian camera pictures that were shown in this doc where disturbing to me. I think that the whole 9/11 situation is not all that is said. People only see media and what Mr. Bush ha to say about the issue. I am verry serious about this typing and i am not at all joking. I wouls like to hear peoples thoughts on there beliefs on 9/11. thankyou

OK.. FOLLOW UP TO SOME ANSWERS. I RESPECT YOUR ANSWERS AND CAN SEE WHAT SOME HAVE TO SAY. IN REPLY TO THE PERSON THAT SAID THAT IM JUST STIRRING UP MEMORIES AND I SHOULD JUST PRETTY MUCH LEAVE IT.... I am sorry and i understand but i dont think that alot of people knowthe full truth and happenings of 9/11. Please dont think im stiring old memories and that I dont respect the lives of those who dies. Thankyou

Ok.. Im not the only one who has seen this tape. other people have to. Please dont be dissing me personally, I didnt say its a HOAX... i said that there is bits missing. Please read others comments

Answer 1

It is weird tha you have asked this question because this morning i have received Loose Change 2 to watch on dvd. I had to buy it from E-Bay as apparently the US government banned it after it was screened over there. I can't wait to watch it as it supposedly has loads of info on there that "almost" proves that 911 can not have happened how it was reported to have done. Will let you know what it hink when i have watched it. If it is the one that you watched and you want to know what seller i got it from, let me know and i will e-mail you the details. Oh my God, better watch my back now or they'll be after me!!

Answer 2

I have not seen the documentary and it is very difficult to pass comment. However there will always be conspiracy theories in the same way as Kennedy's death, Princess Di's death and whether man ever landed on the moon. I cannot possibly believe that the Americans were behind it. What purpose would it have served? Don't say it gave America the excuse to invade Iraq as this would have probably happened without 9/11. Did the British government authorise the carrying out of the bombings on the London tubes and bus? I think not. What you working for a fraud squad has to do with it is beyond me. Videos and pictures can be doctored. So called evidence can be edited to show what the people want you to believe. I think you are rather naive and in some strange way you want to believe the Americans were behind it.

Answer 3

I think the bombings had a lot more to them than meets the eyes,
1; what the hell happened at the pentagon? I have seen some pictures that show the plane hitting and the debry after the supposed crash! Im not a crash investigator but I would say there was no where near a big enough hole in the pentagon and there was no plane debry!! Odd! also why has there never been a mention of the dead in the pentagon
2; why do the government insit on saying that the plane that went down over the desert was grounded by passengers, why wont they just admit that they shot it down, i know it makes a good story saying that they brought it down themeselves (the passengers) but it doesnt ring true.
3; there is much to suggest that the government knew a lot more about this attack before it happened
4; I dont know how true this is, but i heard that a lot of the people working in the twin towers had 9/11 off for some reason, is there any possibility that this could be related.
I dont know exactly what happened, i dont know if the American government is that messed up that it would kill its own people but what I do know what I feel, and I feel that something is fishy about the whole thing.
I dont want to believe this but part of me thinks it was just a vechicle to facilitate the war in Iraq

Answer 4

Most of these movies present distortions or outright lies claiming that 9-11 was an "inside job." Most of the claims are simply ludicrous, such as

"A missle hit the Pentagon" However, dozens of people saw the plane coming in, had their stories printed in the newspaper. There were photos of plane wreckage in all the papers. Here's a good one:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)

"The Twin towers could not fall from the jets" However, there is about 40-50 articles by engineers saying it was the jets. There is not one article on the face of the earth that says the jets could not have done it. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) is one example. See
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

Here is a summary of why it was not an "inside job":


SCIENCE
--All the structural engineers & demolition experts who have published journal articles on 9/11 have come out against a conspiracy. There are no published articles by the “experts” cited by the conspiracy theorists

MOTIVE
--Bush, corporations, or his friends could just as easily make money with no risk by: receipt of lobbying, giving themselves options, awarding pork barrel contracts, kickbacks, etc. This is the way Washington works, & there’s no need for killing innocent Americans.

--It has been claimed that unusual financial transactions were made before 9-11. Actually, all such transactions are a matter of public record. However, upon inspection, no such transactions occurred to any meaningful extent. (See Point 6, at:
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355

If such transactions did occur, then who did it? When? For how much? Specifics are needed for believability.

SECRECY
--As they say, 3 people can keep a secret IF 2 of them are dead. So many people would have to be involved that SOMEONE should have come forward by now.

KNOWN KILLERS
--Al-Qaeda is the self-admitted agent with documented motives. In 1993, they attacked the WTC using a truck bomb and they were behind the attack on the US in Mogadishu. In 1996, Bin Laden issued a fatwa (basically a declaration of war) against the United States. In 2000 al-Qaeda bombed the missile destroyer U.S.S. Cole near Yemen, killing 17 servicemen. They bombed trains in London and Spain, and have been active in Algeria, Somalia and Kenya, Pakistan, etc, etc. The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, admitted guilt in court.

VAGUENESS OF THE CLAIMS
--The actual person or organization who supposedly pulled off the 9/11 inside job has never been named. It would seem that no one is actually named because then the conspiracy claim could be immediately verified out in the open with a real person. Are conspiracists afraid that the claims would be then be proven wrong? In any event, lack of details & vagueness suggests falsehood. Specific claims are more believable.

WRONG PSYCHOLOGY
--Very few people have the psychologic makeup to be mass-murderers, & they usually show signs of it beforehand (like Hitler did in Mein Kampf). People like Bush & Cheney don’t become mass murderers; mass murderers are more like “Son of Sam” & Jeffrey Dahmer.
------
Another note:
Yes, WTC7 fell even though it wasn't hit by a plane. So did the Marriott World Trade Center and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church.
The following buildings were massively damaged & had to be demolished: 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center.
The Deutsche Bank Building across Liberty Street & not in the WTC complex, was declared a total loss in 2004 & demolition began in 2007. There's alot more.

Answer 5

I might not ever in a million years be able to prove it, but I know in my bones, with out a doubt that our (U.S.) government was somehow behind 9/11. The whole rigging of the 2000 election, etc... they needed a way to brain wash the people in our country to fall along with their plans. It seemed to work really well. If 9/11 had not happened, there is no way that the country would have bought going to Afghanistan or Iraq.

Way back, after Bush won the nomination for the 2000 election, my husband used to say that if Bush won that there would probably be some kind of terrorist attack, because Bush was an idiot, and he was sure to screw something up, we never dreamed that it would be anything like 9/11. (we are from Texas, so we knew even back then). Of course at that time it was all just such a joke to think that he would actually be the president of our country. How spoiled we were.

Answer 6

9/11 has 2 massive holes in its story ! 1) building 7 was pulled by larry silverstein the owner FACT. ie he had the building demolished on that awful day....can some sane person tell me while the events of that day are on going a team went in to rig building 7 with explosives--sorry a building that big cannot be rigged to come down in one day--must have been rigged up days in advance...if it was--so were the twin towers huge hole! No2: this would be the first time in history 4 planes have VAPOURISED in an accident? im sorry but plane crashes leave debris--they even recovered 75% of twa flight 800 from the floor of the atlantic! and they are telling you an amateur pilot flew at 500mph , 4 feet off the ground and caused a 16 foot hole in the pentagon --come on people use your common sense.....and while im here next time your on a plane see how long it takes for your mobile to automatically switch off....they dont work above a certain height! there is enough doubt in these two holes that tells me 9/11 was an inside job-- to create perpetual war

Answer 7

you are asking people to comment on something that you are not prepared to describe - the debate on 9/11 has raged for the last few years and has never reached any sort of resolution. You are raising another question about something that we haven't seen and which from what your question says is quite extremist.. you need to give an indication as to the nature of what your video was in order for us to understand the object of your question.

I would like to add that you are asking people their opinion but you have skirted around giving your own. Why do you think that it was a government orchestrated attack?

Answer 8

I think that you and, others like you, have got something missing in your lives that have to be addressed to.
Either you've had an miserable childhood and, want something to fulfill that gap or, you have a grudge to fill in life and need people and, publicity to keep your lifestyle going. With all, I mean all as in thousands of video tapes, pictures, eye witnesses and other types of on sight issues, this one tape your speaking about is the "Golden Calf" of the twin towers?

I don't think so. Whether you have some kind of security back-ground or not, remains to be seen, this does not, by all means make you an expert. I think you should find yourself a life.

Another thing, your security background IE: should have a better English background, writing and verbal use. Yours is real bad, check with your English teacher the next time you try and "Hoax" us.

By the way, I have been to Three Universities, majored in English and Math, Medicine and lab. I believe what I've seen.

Answer 9

Uh, not if I comprehend the question. it fairly is not extra concept that turns suggestions into actuality. A actuality is a actuality from the 2d it fairly is spoken. What makes us comprehend this is a actuality is extra sorting out and experimentation. suggestions are actual or not in accordance to the extentthat they properly mirror the actual international. on the different hand, there are suggestions approximately dynamic issues which may be fake one 2d and actual the subsequent. So, if i think of "it fairly is hour of darkness" at 11 p.m. i think you're able to be able to desire to assert my concept could gradually "ripen" into actuality as 12 a.m. techniques.

Answer 10

There is a very good article by Michael Meacher (who was going to stand against Gordon Brown) which had to be well researched to have been published in the Guardian.
It makes for a chilling read.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1036571,00.html