George Carlin. Although he is a bit biased toward the left, he doesn't trust anyone and isn't afraid to speak his mind!
OHM: This conspiracy nonsense is getting old! Kucinich is following the (12% approval rated) group and is just another raving far-left lunatic!
2007-10-02 21:28:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dan K 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I vote for Ohm's answer. I would add Bill Richardson.. I see him running the white house like the series West Wing.. I think he would be one of the greatest because he has the foreign policy experience we need and cares about the people and could be trusted to make important decisions with careful thought instead of waiting for God to tell him what to do like we have now.
2007-10-03 04:20:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Newton Gingrich. I attended a conference of his. He is an eloquent speaker with fantastic ideas. I feel neither party would embrace his platform, however. They both seem too absorbed in their own ideologies and beholden to special interests.
TO MINNKID43: Why is ones sex such a special qualification? Ms. Clinton has accomplished little as a state representative and is nothing more than another politico who answers to well-financed masters (Moveon.org, George Soros, etc.).
2007-10-03 04:17:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ugandanprince 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Any other world politician with no connections whatsoever to the Bilderberg/Bohemian Grove/Illuminati Mafia.
Probably very hard to find.
2007-10-03 08:27:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vivagaribaldi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would vote for Oprah Winfrey.
She's smart, comitted, well-informed, and I think she would have the interests of the American people at heart.
2007-10-03 05:21:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Theresa 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Dennis Kunnich or Ron Paul.
Why, you may ask? Because they are the ONLY 2 candidates that uphold the constitution.
Theories go unproven.
I'm a conspiracy truthist.
2007-10-03 04:15:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ohm 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Christopher Walken.
Now who's not scared of Walken?
2007-10-03 09:00:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by hwan_tu 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hilary bcause she will have a past president by her side.
2007-10-03 04:06:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eason W 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
john stewart
2007-10-03 04:17:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by stoopiddumbface 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
HILARY CLINTON, BECAUSE A MAN HAS BEEN IN OFFICE FOR OVER TWO HUNDRED YEARS AND WE ARE TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN DEBT. SHE CAN KEEP THE PURSE STRINGS TIED...
2007-10-03 04:15:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Minnkid43 1
·
1⤊
4⤋