It depends on gender. I'm a girl (ignore the avatar), so I personally would want to be under 5'8 because a) it's easier to find guys who are taller (all girls want their beaus to be taller) b) I feel more feminine being petite c) it's easier to find clothes that fit (you can always hem them if they're too long) d) most women are under 5'8 (anything taller is a little freakish)
But since you're a boy, I'd say that if I were a guy, I'd want to be over 6'8. Wait!! No. I take that back. I would rather be under 5'8. a) Women nowadays are under 5'5 so it's not hard to find someone who's shorter than you, b) I'd be non-threatening, c) it's easier to find clothes that fit (again, the hemming), d) the average height for a man is 5'9, so I won't deviate that much from the norm, e) there are lots of successful men who are 5'8 so you can forget that crap about height making you more powerful.
2007-10-02 19:46:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by dancingpuppy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm 5'10"
I think I'd go shorter. My impression is tall people don't live as long & typically have more back problems.
And while a little height might help you with the ladies. Say 6'2" to 6'4" - 6'10" is starting to get a bit freakish.
Also I like petite women. So being 6'10" whould create a physical ackwardness.
Also as an engineer, height has no impact on my profession.
If I were a footballplayer or a boxer maybe. (Though I would regard both of these as bad career choices) Even if I were a soildier, I'd still go with 5'8". Never hurts to be a smaller target.
2007-10-02 19:45:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phoenix Quill 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
short under 5''8
2007-10-02 19:23:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by ethel 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
a million. Would you alternatively move on a date with Justin Bieber or Simon Cowell? Nether, I'm a man and I do not swing like that. two. Would you alternatively move shark diving or climb Mount Everest? Climb Mount Everest. three. Would you alternatively die at a healthful age at 60 or die at a nasty wellbeing while your ninety? Healthy at 60 four. Would you alternatively be wealthy or popular? Rich five. Would you alternatively possess a limo or horse and carriage? Limo 6. Would you alternatively consume cheese for the relaxation of your existence, or ham for the relaxation of your existence? Cheese, I hate ham 7. Would you alternatively delete your Y!A account or fb account? YA given that I wouldn't have Facebook eight. Would you alternatively be a viking or an egyptian? I am part Egyptian so I wager Egyptian nine. Would you alternatively are living in America or Spain? America 10. Would you alternatively of lived your formative years within the 60's or eighty's? eighty's
2016-09-05 15:52:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm female....
so I'd choose "short".....(cause I am under
5'8") (and it's not so bad)
if I was a guy, I would want to be tall....
i could play basketball or reach in high places.
2007-10-02 19:25:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by LIzzz 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Given your options, it's an easy choice. I'm 5'7" and am not considered "short", but average. I'd definitely rather be 5'7" than 6'9". If you'd change the options... would I rather be 5'0" or 6'8", then I'd rather by 6'8".
2007-10-02 19:25:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by A Plague on your houses 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm 5"3' and not complaining but I wouldn't mind being 5"8'
2007-10-02 19:28:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by mhyalene 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm already under 5'8" (5'5") so I'd like to be over 6'8" for a while.
2007-10-02 19:24:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
5"8 , it is very very good , now i am just 5"2 , and 5"8 seems okay , see , I am not greedy !
2007-10-02 19:23:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tall. I'm only 6'2", which is short for my family.
I would prefer to be taller.
2007-10-02 19:23:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by California Boy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋