2007-10-02 17:31:25 · 9 answers · asked by QuillSB74 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Keep in mind that sometimes a peace hero can be a soldier, and a war hero can be a civilian.
2007-10-02 17:42:07 · update #1
Jesus was a peace hero.
So was Ghandi.
War hero is more celebrated, but a hero who creates peace is more significant.
2007-10-02 19:03:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
who is more significant?
it is easier to be a peace hero than a war hero.....! a war hero is constantly in serious danger, not the same can be said about some peace hero...! more war heroes die every day for our freedoms than peace heroes...!
so the answer becomes clear!
2007-10-02 17:37:08 · answer #2 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I consider a war hero to be far more credible. i have not seen a "peace hero" recently. tho i bet the Democrats believe they are.
2007-10-02 17:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Having served for 20 years in the military, I find your question to be ridiculous. A war hero faces death. Your peace hero faces a night in the pokey. Give me a break.
2007-10-02 17:47:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
.
They are two sides of the same coin. Both call for sacrifice, Ghandi, MLK, John Lennon are just as important as Patton, Bradley, MacArthur.
2007-10-02 18:40:40 · answer #5 · answered by cynical 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a hero is a hero -period
2007-10-02 17:45:15 · answer #6 · answered by old man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so called "peace heros" are usually insane.
2007-10-02 17:43:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
They are both equally credible.
2007-10-02 18:07:55 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Dog 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only to a fool. Appeasement is nothing but cowardice.
2007-10-02 17:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by callAspadeAspade 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋