English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just saw a question posted by a Republican female that was absolutely HILARIOUS! The poster agreed with Ann Coulter's assertion that it would be a good idea to take away women's right to vote, so that the Democrats would have fewer voters. Well, let's see here. Do most women vote Democratic? Yes. Do ALL of them? No. I reminded this female that if that if she and Ann Coulter couldn't vote, that would mean at least 2 fewer votes for the Republicans. Isn't such logic (or the lack thereof) astounding!:)

2007-10-02 14:33:09 · 20 answers · asked by tangerine 7 in Politics & Government Politics

tslover: Why don't you practice what you preach and not vote in the next election. It would make a lot of people very happy.:)

2007-10-02 14:41:03 · update #1

20 answers

Technically I guess it would mean both parties would lose a lot of votes...more importantly it would lose a lot of our soul as a country.

2007-10-02 14:35:40 · answer #1 · answered by C.S. 5 · 5 0

Of course both would lose votes but the dems would lose more just as the republicans would suffer more of white men werent allowed to vote being roughly 70% of us vote republican according to recent studies/polls. If blacks werent allowed to vote it would hurt the dems though the repubs would lose votes too etc etc etc. Ann is an extremist but she wasnt advocating the loss of voting rights for women, she was just noting that women unfortunately are more easily swayed by the democratic nanny state message and if they couldnt vote that it would hurt the dems more

2007-10-02 14:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

It would not make any difference because in most states women`s votes are thrown away and not counted anyway. It was determined a long time ago by a group of knowledgeable and respected men that women just did not have what it takes upstairs to have a say in who is elected to public offices.Of course all states go through what appears to be a legitimate process of allowing the women to vote. The states that do count the women`s votes are referred to as backward and third world states by the other advanced states. When the votes are turned in by the backward states they are immediately disposed of by a backward state ballot shredder. It should be obvious without further enlightenment that it would not make any difference to the republicans whether the women are allowed to vote are not.

2007-10-02 15:17:46 · answer #3 · answered by PILL 1 · 1 2

I think that the determiner of who votes republican these days is a matter of intelligence and awareness.

Its not gender, its not age, its not race, its not '_________'.

On the other hand, these days, there are two parties, Democrats (comparatively, the party of the people) and Neo-Cons (essentially, the fascists). The republican party, as it once was is gone.

Those that still vote for it, in my opinion, just haven't noticed yet.

This is my opinion. To call for it to be censored is to ask for Hilary to censor your own opinion. Do you want that? Then accept a difference of opinion already.

2007-10-02 14:46:05 · answer #4 · answered by Justin 5 · 1 0

Yes because their are more women in the USA, and if more women voted we would for better or worse have a lock on the election process

2007-10-02 14:45:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If you believe that more women vote FOR republican than democrats, you should be red ( your face ) , not tangerine. While there are plenty of hard-core conservative women, you see more of the urbanized women voting Democratic tickets. Not all, by far, but there are plenty of polls, surveys, and statistics to prove that more women will vote Dem than Repub.
- The Gremlin GUY -

2007-10-02 14:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ann Coulter has a book to peddle and so she is going to say anything that is sure to keep her in the news so she can sell more of her pathetic re-hash books. The people who put more money into her pockets for spewing such hatred and narrow minded views is amazing. Her 15 minutes should have been over a long time ago.

2007-10-02 14:38:34 · answer #7 · answered by Beatrice C 6 · 3 4

Ha! Stop Women's Suffrage now! That never gets old. Anything that comes out of Mann Coulter(like face hugger aliens) should be flushed out like waste. Do not expect too much logic from her or a lot of other Republicans. Be safe and VOTE DRAGON!

DRAGON 2008
"I BELIEVE IN U.S."

2007-10-02 14:39:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Nope

2007-10-02 14:46:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, it means the sexist men out there, would be so happy, that they would feel obligated to get off their duffs, to go out and vote republican.

2007-10-02 14:36:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers