English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Packers needs a running game!
Vikings need help at QB!

Even trade?

2007-10-02 14:12:31 · 11 answers · asked by Mark G 1 in Sports Football (American)

11 answers

It might be a good idea for the Packers to trade Rodgers, but they could definitely get more than Mewelde Moore. RBs aren't worth much in the trading market, especially mediocre ones like Moore.

The Packers could get AT LEAST a 2nd round pick for Rodgers. That's a lot more valuable than Moore. Rodgers is probably worth a RB with clear starting potential, someone like Ronnie Brown or Willis McGahee. Look at the Matt Schaub trade if you don't know what the value of a very good backup is.

2007-10-02 14:53:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Aaron Roders was too much of an investment to be let go right now. He is in his third year in the packers system and has done well in the preseason. The packers are set on defense and the passing attack is very good, i would like to see the packers give up a draft pick instead of moving players around and missing up the chemistry this packer team has right now.

2007-10-03 00:32:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Never happen. The Packers GM Ted Thompson would faint at the thought. The way Thompson works, the Vikings would have to give their entire organization AND their first born children in order to get Rodgers.

2007-10-02 14:32:49 · answer #3 · answered by Starmark 4 · 0 0

NO. Rodgers has been learning for two years. He had a good preseason, why dump him now? Moore won't do anything for the running game. He doesn't know the system at all. It's not the running backs, it's the blocking and knowing the system. It's the dumbest trade I ever heard of.

2007-10-02 14:49:18 · answer #4 · answered by repeat offender 3 · 0 1

I study this two times. the kind you layer longer tale-appropriate prose is admirable, and a few thing I even have lots worry with. you're making it look common, organic, yet all people who write understand the different is genuine. I normally degree the effectiveness of somewhat by using the form of TD's........Jealousy rears that is eco-friendly head. Kudos to you, Mr Carney.

2016-10-10 04:56:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

nah, aaron rodgers will always be on the packers and will never play. haha. id like to see the packers get ricky williams

2007-10-02 14:17:12 · answer #6 · answered by . . . . . 3 · 0 1

I love the Packers, but not fond of Rodgers, he always seems to get hurt or whine about something.......

2007-10-02 15:26:12 · answer #7 · answered by Melissa R 4 · 0 1

im a vikings fan...if we get that opportunity, we better take it....i like moore, hes a good runner, hes smart, hes a good punt returner, an average kick returner, has great hands, and he can throw.....he is basically Lt with more returning skill....just less talented in the running game

2007-10-02 14:23:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. He is their future at QB. Yes their running game is weak but I think Morency and Brandon Jackson will do for now.

2007-10-02 14:28:30 · answer #9 · answered by Dirty Sanchez 5 · 1 0

who the heck is that? no, no way. if i havent heard of a player that plays my team twice a year he obviously aint very good. by the way, give rodgers a chance. he looked good in the preseason.we have a bunch of rookies for rb's be patient, they'll come through. our OL should provide holes by december, until them. we'll beat everybody through the air.

2007-10-02 16:46:25 · answer #10 · answered by The Claymaker- Go Pack! 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers