which one and why
2007-10-02 13:44:16 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
i'm not sayin i'm gonna vote for either, but just tell me so i can understand this big debate between the 2 of them
2007-10-02 13:49:44 · update #1
I'm not voting for either one. But thought I'd relay an interesting tidbit I found in one of the local newspapers. The article reported on Obama's family tree. It turns out that Obama is distantly related to George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Also I seem to recall reading that the Bushes were involved in a Pacific Group which was mentioned in a newspaper article related to Refco, the company that was under investigation and from which Obama bought a lot next to his own. If these things are true, it explains a great deal about how Obama got so popular so quickly and it further explains why the blacks keep saying that Obama "isn't black enough". It also explains how Obama has been able to raise so much money so quickly. But this information, once verified would ensure that Obama should never be elected to the Presidency.
2007-10-02 14:47:19 · answer #1 · answered by Mindbender 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither. Absolutely neither. I've read through the answers given so far and there are some good ones... as always, peppered with the moronic and hateful ones... but there're really good reasons why neither of them is qualified to be President that have nothing to do with gender or race or any of the other 'distractions' they want you to focus on.
Hillary wants to absolutely screw up the healthcare system. Don't believe me? Ask the people in Canada and England who have to wait MONTHS for an appointment to SEE a Doctor because the government manages their healthcare.
They do such a wonderful job with the DMV, too, right?
She also lies through her teeth and will say absolutely anything to get elected with no accountability. The media never calls her on her hypocrisy. Do you want someone like that to HAVE power? Not me.
Obama is a child politically. He suggested BOMBING an ally (Pakistan) if we got intel that Osama were there. Would he say the same thing about, say, Canada? England? Talk about being more than willing to blow up innocent civilians... his approach seems to indicate that this is fine as long as they are of a certain persuasion. Don't do it if they're anything like us...
Truthfully, there isn't a qualified candidate ON the Democratic side, period. Not one. I'm still sizing up the Republicans and Independents but I can see clearly that no one on that side has a clue or, hopefully, a chance.
2007-10-02 16:18:48 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Hillary will spend all the money she can get and then some. She will tax us to the hilt and the entire nation will be in shambles. She will put together a health plan that won't work and will end up putting many of us at risk because we won't be able to get the care we need. She is not supportive of the military, who she has little respect for; she is not accustomed to dealing with foreign nations and is mean spirited when she isn't getting her way. She is not someone who can deal with terrorism or illegal immigration. We need a strong leader who does not make decisions based on the polls. She has a shady background and has lied and cheated and gotten away with it. She is not an appropriate leader.
Obama: Not experienced enough for any of the things he will be faced with. I am not at all comfortable with him in the position of Leader of the Nation.
2007-10-02 14:00:18 · answer #3 · answered by turkeybrooknj 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope, neither. Especially not Obama. Hillary is a straight forward socialist. Obama is a two faced, lying, socialist.
2007-10-02 14:49:43 · answer #4 · answered by John himself 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama because of his diplomacy, honesty and sincerity. He hasn't been in Washington DC long enough to be corrupted. And he has a great education plan. But I feel that we will get Hillary.
2007-10-02 16:29:54 · answer #5 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Obama would give our enemies what ever they want thinking they would then leave us alone. Hillary wants power for the sake of power.
2007-10-02 13:57:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Rudy supporters are going be in for a big surprise come general election time.
And that 's all I have to say.
2007-10-02 14:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by Michael M 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I guess it comes down to what your priorities in today's politics are. For example, if you feel strongly about change in the Iraq war, I would go with Obama. If you feel strongly about Health Care for your kids and the economy, I would go with Hillary. There is no perfect candidate that could have the solution to all of today's issues, so you should choose whoever supports what you think is most important for yourself & the rest of America.
2007-10-02 13:51:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Another way of putting it is to use their middle names, Rodham and Hussein, that makes it easier. I choose Rodham.
2007-10-02 14:06:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither are worthy
2007-10-02 14:51:50 · answer #10 · answered by SoAZ Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋