...& yet condone Giuliani's affair while NYC mayor. Isn't that a hypocritical double standard? And wasn't the fact that Giuliani let his wife find out he was divorcing her in a press conference (how humiliating) instead of telling her first worse? What about the fact that he brought his mistress to live with him in Gracie Mansion while his wife & children were still living there? How come I never hear I'm not voting for him because....(all of the above)? Instead, he's the Republican 'front-runner'. Is this an example of good family values? If it is, then your values are all screwed up. It's no wonder the Republican party is all f*cked up!
2007-10-02 12:17:59 · 20 answers · asked by The Wiz 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Imagine if Hillary had gotten divorced. Wouldn't she them be damned for being against family values and against marriage. It's a really damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. It's Bill's fault not hers.
2007-10-02 12:20:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm a conservative and I do not support Rudy or Hillary. In fact, I'd rather Hillary won than Rudy, that may be the only way to get the Republican party back on track and sticking to its core principles: low spending and smaller government. The current power in the Republican party appears to be trying to out-Democrat the Democrats.
And I don't care if Hillary stuck with Bill, I think the whole marriage was one of convenience so that both could boost each other's careers. With Bill's apparent sex drive, if they really loved each other, I'd think that they would have more than one child.
Both Hillary and Rudy want the Presidency for the title, not because they want to do what's best for this country or its people.
2007-10-02 14:56:06 · answer #2 · answered by Brian R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"So he's gay do you have a concern with gays?" What you look forgetting is your guy or woman question. The question has to do with better halves being publicly humiliated by ability of their husbands. On that score, the Republicans do no longer take a back seat to the Democrats. besides, are not the Republicans people who declare to be the "professional family members" occasion? Why then do you mean on your little rant that there is something incorrect with a woman who would not throw her marriage below the bus whilst her husband screwed up (or around)?
2016-12-17 15:33:33 · answer #3 · answered by cavallo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hypocrisy? Try these links and come back to me that this is a candidate to trust? First felon to be pardoned (by Carter 4 draft dodge) to become President. First President to be disbarred while holding office. Obstruction of justice and perjury. And Billy Graham came to Hillary saying forgive and accept the Lord as your savior.
Running for re-election the junior Senator claimed she would not run for President and take care of New York. OK.
She has taken $10 mil left over from that run and added it to the run for President. Taken away money from NY State. (CBSNews.com today inside the lead story).
Yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton is more than meets the eye. As two for one we can only expect the same. You don't mix zebra's and giraffes. They are paired alike. Beyond the contempt for women & families everywhere condoning affairs for political gain is no President for me. Thank you.
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/clintondraft.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_(controversy)
2007-10-02 12:52:24 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The fact Hillary is a dem has nothing to do with me not planning on voting for her. I simply won't vote for her because anything that bleeds for a week every month and doesn't die is just pure evil. The last thing I want in the White House with the power to send the world into a nuclear holocaust is someone who is ruled by an overabundance of hormones nearly 1/4th of every month. And yes, she may be too old for that..but you know what they say. "Menopause never actually ends.." And that is faaar worse than PMS any day.
2007-10-02 13:13:11 · answer #5 · answered by crazylifer 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Actually, it's more the far left young liberals that say that. They don't have a clue about what it means to work hard to save a crippled marriage. But you make a great point. As far as the Republicans go it's always do as we say not as we do.
2007-10-02 14:07:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The real reason is that she's a socialist and will tax the crap out of anyone making a dime and throw a bone of 'free healthcare' to the masses, some of whom aren't in the country legally. And then you'd find out when you needed that healthcare, there would be a waiting line and you could die before someone in govt gave enough of a **** to get you served.
That her husband would rather dik someone else is a plus for him.
2007-10-02 13:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I've heard that mantra many times here & elsewhere. Very stupid & inmature. Just like the things crazylifer is saying. I guess he has never heard of male menopause. Is that what happened to Bush?
2007-10-02 14:18:58 · answer #8 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The fact that Hillary stuck with Bill after Monica & Juanita Broderick indicates that she will do anything, and pretend to be anybody, in order to accumulate power. That is scary.
2007-10-02 12:41:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary and Bill stayed married through difficult times. All the people attacking them have all been divorced multiple times (that's from the "family values" party!)
2007-10-02 12:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋