That just goes to show that he does not know what he is talking about. He is a young Senator who wants to be President. He has no idea what it take to lead this country.
2007-10-02 12:01:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Monica K 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
First USA should give Pakistan the proper and latest equipment to seal its border with Afghanistan then criticize Pakistan, I wonder how Americans can only blame Pakistan for Taliban attacks? Since all 35 NATO nations are in Afghanistan with their latest equipments USA itself is there with the number one technology, Afghanistan should care about its borders but yet the whole world and specially USA blame only only PAKISTAN.
We all know that USA can't secure its easy border with Mexico with its world number one technology but they expect Pakistan to secure its Mountainous border with Afghanistan, i just wonder on the hypocrisy of Americans.
Securing Pakistan Afghanistan border is a joint joint joint responsibility of all NATO and specially AMERICAN & Afghanistan & then PAKISTAN.
And Pakistan has lost more troops & civilians than USA or any other country for this so called war of terror.
USA and WEST first look at their deeds then point out their fingers on Pakistan, USA must must must give Pakistan the latest spying equipments otherwise they should not expect something from Pakistan which is not possible even from them.
Bush praises Pakistan in terror fight - South and Central Asia - MSNBC.com
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11651039/from/RSS
Dozens of soldiers missing in Pakistan tribal area - Yahoo! News
news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070830/wl_afp/pakistanafghanistan_070830172923
AND LIST GOES ON AND ON AND ONNNNNNNNN, All USA is doing providing ARMS & having nuclear deals to Pakistan’s number ONE enemy India and despite of that asking Pakistan to do all for them. WOW what a friend is USA if of Pakistan.
& OOOOBAAAMAA SHOULD KNOW THAT THAT “PAKISTAN IS NOT AN COUNTRY SO USA OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY MAKE THEIR MOVE AND GET AWAY WITH IT”.
2007-10-05 09:32:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the only ingredient, in my opinion, to end the warfare on Terror, is to enable the armed forces do what they have been created for, dying and destruction to the enemy, whoever they could be. If innocents get interior the way, too undesirable. supply up the politicians and the media from attempting to run a warfare and the warfare on Terrorism could have been over an prolonged time in the past. point each and all of the cities by using huge bombing and quicker or later the folk of the countries who're harboring 'terrorists' might upward thrust up and do away with those terrorists themselves to keep away from something of the rustic from dying or being destroyed. it somewhat is the only thank you to habit warfare. do lots injury and created lots dying, that the enemy capitulates. you could no longer end warfare or supply up drugs or decrease the fees of prescriptions and wellbeing care by using speaking approximately it. warfare is warfare is dying and destruction. it somewhat is all that's and ever would be, if the politicians and the media might stay out of it. in my opinion.
2016-10-10 04:43:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by marolf 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama keeps talking about invading Pakistan to capture Osama Bin Laden and bring him to justice because Bush isn't worried about him anymore and is letting him go scot free. Another thing that can be accomplished is bringing those who offer him safe harbor to justice.
2007-10-02 12:00:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because he knows that is where the real terrorist Osama is being shacked up in some cushy little place with rugs on the floor and all the kabobs he can eat between dialisis!
2007-10-02 12:00:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by scottanthonydavis 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's called jingoistic rhetoric.
Why don't you ask him via his web site?
Your guess is as good as any. But don't speculate. Go to the source. Write to him.
2007-10-02 11:58:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by cafegroundzero 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
because he's an idiot. Pakistan is a friendly government, and they have nukes. Any incursion by US forces will in all likelyhood result in that government being overthrown, and and terrorists having access to those nukes.
2007-10-02 12:01:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
looky here yall. let me, osama bush ladan tells ya sumptin.
their aint much left. shoot i got uhrack and iran is on the list. so mr bobamba is goint to get pakisani.
besides he aint gettin erlected. hilree is. i endorsed hilrree and she is gonna win. she'll win or i dont own diabold!
poo poo flwoer endorsed her. fig newton grinche endorsed her. the repujican people is stupid. they dont get it. we in charge are gonna put kilree in.
what dont the repujicans get?
2007-10-02 12:00:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
he wants osama, knucklehead..the guy Bush promised couldnt hide from us..the guy that attacked us on 9-11 or do u think saddam was our enemy. Fox noise channel will confuse you
2007-10-02 11:59:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Blacks and Asians hate each other. East Indians in particular have always thought of Blacks as impure and devilish. So Obama figures it's time for payback.
2007-10-02 12:01:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by censored 2
·
2⤊
2⤋