Ok.. after 4 weeks of NFL play, there remains 4 teams that are still 4-0
New England, Indianapolis, Dallas, and Green Bay...
Which one of these four is the weakest team, and which one will be the first to take a loss?
2007-10-02 11:50:02 · 19 answers · asked by minitrail70 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Ok..... let'sbe clear...
Who is the weakest team?
then...
Weak or not... who will be the first team to take a loss?
2007-10-02 13:52:47 · update #1
Dallas is the weakest. Being a Colts fan, it definately scares me to be going to play a hot Tampa Bay team this week. However the Colts never lose in the first 9 games of the year. I'll say Dallas overlooks Buffalo this week on MNF because they're looking ahead to New England.
2007-10-02 11:58:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Right now, I'm wanting to say Packers. They are my team, but right now they don't seem to have much of a running game. They're defense has been good and if they can get their running game they can be good but as of now. Favre and defense can only hold them for so long but then again, they weren't supposed to be 4-0 either.
In terms of loss, I don't think Green Bay will be the first to lose a game, I would have to say the Cowboys on that one. But, I think the Packers are the weakest because they do not have a good running game so may not be much farther behind. I think the Packers will probably have a lower record than the Cowboys though in the end. Of course as a Packer fan, I have to hope they do better. By reasoning however the Packers may be able win a few more games by their defense, but without the offense it will be very difficult to get very far. We'll see though.
2007-10-02 18:58:16 · answer #2 · answered by Kelly s 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say that the weakest team is Green Bay and the 1st one of those 4 to take a loss will be INDY
2007-10-02 22:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by Cincyfan0591 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hate to say it but Green Bay, no running game will get you so far. Dallas will fall next. New England may be the first to lose, but i would never consider them the weakest of the four. They may be caught by surprise with the Browns on Sunday in the short week.
2007-10-02 18:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by dCon 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
first there is a difference between the weakest and first to take a loss... all of these teams are pretty solid, hence the record, but who's running in Greenbay?! Brett Favre has more yards on the ground in touchdown celebrations than that backfield commitee this year... so i think they are the weakest since that situation won't improve and Brett Favre is renowned for making bad choices when nothing's open, but I have Indy being the first to lose. they've been the closest to losing and don't have any alterior motives for playing (winning for Brett Favre one last year). In the end it doesn't really matter... the Bigger question is will the Pats lose?! keep in mind that they been playing without Rodney Harrison and Richard Seymour, yet have the number one ranked defense.
2007-10-02 19:06:52 · answer #5 · answered by Team Jesus 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1.New England-they are the best team this year
2.Indianapolis-The only threat to the Patriots this year.
3.Dallas-Will be New England's victim in the Super Bowl
4.Green Bay-Very surprising this year.Can they keep it up?
Green Bay's the weakest and will probably take the first loss.
2007-10-02 19:13:18 · answer #6 · answered by BEJEWELED 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
dallas. without stud receivers in owens and witten (along with the fairly-reliable-of-late crayton), i can't see how romo can reasonably succeed. even if you throw in garrard in dallas, i'll bet he'll be nearly as productive. regardless, the dallas defense still is questionable, particularly in the secondary. ken hamlin and roy williams are basically the same hard-hitting type of player.
some people are knocking green bay because of their lack of a running game. well, pray to tell, how many other teams with a rookie running back and a decent offensive line (at best) are actually productive overall? none. the closest would be minnesota, but everyone knows how much of a joke it is at qb there. tavaris jackson, your starter? are you kidding me? i said during the entire season they should've picked up jeff garcia, perfect system and opportunity. alas.
but seriously, though, green bay's defense is vastly underrated. with the re-emergence of charles woodson last year, as well as the studly lb corps, this defense may not scare anyone like a pats def pre-snap, but they can more than hold their own. dallas simply has faced foes who shoot themselves in the foot continously or just plain injured (nyg, mia, chi, stl).
but i still think green bay has the 'best' shot at losing first, as they play seattle, whereas dallas plays buffalo. indy plays tampa bay, and both play the same cover 2 scheme, but i think the colts will finish strong (how long can jeff garcia win games with his own legs?).
2007-10-02 19:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by smarty_pants 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Green bay
2007-10-03 14:07:47 · answer #8 · answered by Napoleon Dynamite 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stupid question, new england is way out of the other threes league. Dallas and Indianapolis are way better then green bay. Why do people keep asking stupid questions like this, anyone that thinks the patriots are the 2nd to 32nd best team in the nfl, you are retarded. And anyone who thinks the packers are better then dallas or indianapolis, you are also retarded, green bay isnt a very good team.
2007-10-02 19:10:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
It has to be the Packers. Favre is nails, but at some point the lack of a running game has to catch up to them. I'll say Dallas loses first, though, this weekend in DC against their well rested arch rivals.
2007-10-02 19:00:46 · answer #10 · answered by Edward K 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋