That the tigers released pudge... i heard this so many times today but i can't find anything online about it so i would imagine its not true.. but i just heard so many times..
and if so, was it a good move? why?
and if not, should they...why or why not?
2007-10-02 08:35:10 · 6 answers · asked by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 in Sports ➔ Baseball
wow that article helped but i have to agree.. sure 13 mil is a lot but hes great... he just had a bad offensive year.. whos gonna replace him?
2007-10-02 08:45:12 · update #1
Hadn't heard that, but the Pudge said he felt they were not going to pick-up his $13 million option for 2008. I am a Tigers fan. I feel it is a huge mistake, with all the young pitchers they have. I've looked around- who will they replace him with? If Wilson is healthy next year, .170 in the line up? Inge can't do it-they already replaced him with Pudge. Unless Dombrowski figures Inge can do it.
2007-10-02 08:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by WooleyBooley again 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pudge MAYBE has 1 or 2 years left in him. Now that he's off the juice he's just not as good. I think the Tigers are better off without him. Get some young catcher in there and save some $ at the same time.
2007-10-02 08:45:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In that article, it also mentions Polanco's 142 errorless games this year.
That's amazing!!!!
2007-10-02 08:49:58 · answer #3 · answered by brettj666 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummm maybe you could try rolling it in flour before you karate chop your mailbox with the shovel in the sandbox just dont be afraid to play with it good luck i guess.
2007-10-02 08:44:04 · answer #4 · answered by .... 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah its a good move if they have someone or will have someone who can play as well or better than him or it could just be a salary dump
2007-10-02 08:41:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
read this
2007-10-02 08:38:18 · answer #6 · answered by little__cee 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋