http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071002/od_nm/usa_politics_laugh_dc
Neither of these mannerisms has anything to do with qualifications. *sigh*
2007-10-02 08:08:36 · 14 answers · asked by Pfo 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hate this kind of mindless drivel that basically works around the actual issues we could be looking at. It has nothing to do with politics in actuality, but some people must find it interesting I guess.
2007-10-02 08:12:44 · answer #1 · answered by UriK 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I disagree. The laugh on cue thing points to a real issue with HRC. That issue being she has no internal guiding principles. She is not an authentic person. Her accent changes and wardrobe all demonstrate shes basically willing to say and do what ever to try to win. I would rather vote for someone that says hey thats how I feel about the issue and how I will vote on that issue. She really gives the feeling that you dont know what her agenda is.
2007-10-02 09:03:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Better a ringtone than a witch's cackle.
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-10-02 08:30:36 · answer #3 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Where is the beef? What are the real solutions for the Iraq War, World economy, climate change proposal, immigration policy, how to make the State safer and richer... They just keep on joking, teasing.. and wish us to vote them. It is sad!
Both of them are not that great. Hilliary will talk about her husband's achievement, and Guliani talks about 911 again and again. We need more that just that!
2007-10-02 09:23:27 · answer #4 · answered by Super Mimi 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It is a shame, if the public were not so easily tricked it wouldn't matter. For example in the English elections candidates are more concerned over what cup they drink from then their policies.
2007-10-02 08:15:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
anything to keep the corporate bought (same sponsors according to opensecrets.org) on the front page and the real candidates(so called 2nd tier eg: Ron Paul) off of it . but you have to admit jon stewart saying clintons laughs on cue was funny- and giuliani didnt miss his chance to respond to a question about his phone without referring to 9/11 -they are both a**holes and I cannot understand why anyone would vote for either of these two
2007-10-02 08:21:17 · answer #6 · answered by rooster 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, it is pathetic. But it's only going to get worse. Can you even imagine being under such a microscope 24/7? I sure can't, not without going Postal.
2007-10-02 08:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
looks like yet another reason for Giuliani to say "9/11" to a crowd.
As for Hillary, it's been said for quite awhile that she was showing little personality. So I'm not surprised she's trying to prove she has a sense of humor... or a personality.
Both cases? Pathetic.
2007-10-02 08:13:58 · answer #8 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Yes, it is extremely sad. This is such a poor reflection on Americans if this is what people will vote on versus real issues.
2007-10-02 08:12:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
There IS an old adage when you want to sell something::
"TALK ABOUT ME GOOD, TALK ABOUT ME BAD, JUST DON'T EVER STOP TALKING ABOUT ME "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Typical politicians who have a lot of scatology / shi* to sell, Ohhhh , you want to know what is the scatology / shi* they are selling and want you to buy?? T H E M S E L V E S !!!!
2007-10-02 09:05:24 · answer #10 · answered by I'M HERE 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋