English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The bank says I have to have fire insurance on my home, but it's expensive! Where's Hillary? The DMV says I need insurance on my car, but it's expensive! Where's Hillary? My wife says I need to carry life insurance, but it's expensive! Where's Hillary? I say I need homeowner's insurance, but it's expensive! Where's HIllary? If I forgo all this insurance it could leave me without a home, possessions, or a car to get to work, but it sure is expensive! How come Hillary is so focused on one aspect of insurance? Let's have the government pay for it all!

2007-10-02 08:00:49 · 15 answers · asked by Bigsky_52 6 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

She is promising to make me set up a $5,000 savings account for all of her voters.

I think some people miss the point. Everyone is for Health Care reform. Republicans just do no not want it to become a government run program. Can you name an efficiently run Gov't program? FEMA? I keep seeing the Libs screaming about Bush's veto on health care for the uninsured children. Have any of you actually read the bill or just the headline?

Do you know how many Americans actually "choose" not to buy health Ins.? almost 50% make over 75K! They can afford it! Give us a break. The same percentage of people are uninsured now as were under Clinton, but the Libs keep using the 48 million figure without noting the increase in population. 24 Million poor who are covered under Medicaire, so why not just expand that program to include regular care? Then work on controlling costs, so businesses can get a break?

Does anyone believe that costs will go down if the government runs it?

2007-10-02 08:05:48 · answer #1 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 4 4

Hilary Clinton and a lot of other Americans think that health care should not be about insurance. It should be about prevention and treatment.

The big corporations that currently make trillions denying health care to the citizens who pay premiums in good faith would have us believe that this attitude is the first step to Communist takeover. If that is the case, why are Canada and Great Britain not flying the red flag after half a century of "socialized" medicine? Why is the United States of America the only developed democracy in the world that cannot provide this vital public service?

The people who are making the money now want to keep making it. Believe their lies if you want, but I am voting health care all the way. If the GOP want my vote they had best learn from Germany and Denmark. Sweden has had public health care since FDR was President, and they are still comfortably capitalist.

As for fire and life insurance, do what you will. As a longtime worker in an urban ER, I will vote for the person who will create a system where we can treat the patient without going through his pockets first.

2007-10-02 08:15:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

LMAO guy, and people somewhat need to assist this evil liar... She's working out of money. I questioning how come she would not dig choose in her pocket for yet another $5 million because of the fact that her supporters, particularly those listed decrease than at the instant are not donating to her marketing campaign. They spout off approximately how marvelous she is, yet they do no longer seem to be putting their money the place their mouth is..

2016-11-07 01:42:04 · answer #3 · answered by lizarraga 4 · 0 0

None of the things you mentioned are necessities. Health care is a necessity that everyone should have equal access to. Nice try though.

EDIT: You are missing the point froghair. You can live without buying a house and having to buy fire insurance; you can live without a car and take public transportation instead, you can live without home insurance, if you get robbed you won't get compensated but it won't kill you. It won't kill you to go without any of these things and choose alternatives instead. But it can kill you not to have proper medical care. Get it now?

2007-10-02 08:19:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't really subscribe to the whole nationalized health care approach, however your argument has some serious flaws:
1. Cars are not a necessity. You can take a bus or walk.
2. Home ownership is not a requirement, you can rent.
3. Life insurance is to provide for those that you leave behind if you die. If they can provide for themselves, you don't need life insurance.
4. You mentioned home owners insurance twice.

2007-10-02 08:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 4 3

Because she's a....wait I can't say those words. Might get reported by a Lib ya know, and this time, they'd be justified!
Hells, wants money, and power (put kindly), and doesn't care about the rights or freedom of America. To her we can't even take care of our own children or raise them right. No, to her "It Takes a Village" to raise kids right, and I suppose Chelsea is her example? That poor girl wasn't raised at ALL by her own mother! Mom was too busy making illegal trade deals with Tyson Foods, and shredding her guilty as charged papers in the paper shredder while she worked as a lawyer, at Whitewater!

I always hated the taste of frozen chicken!

2007-10-02 08:20:35 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1 2

Well darn it, at least she is trying to help out with something for the American people unlike what Bush hasn't done for the past 7 yrs.

The money Bush has spent for this war that is going no where could have paid for your insurance's.

2007-10-02 08:12:18 · answer #7 · answered by MadLibs 6 · 0 2

elway the cat has got it wrong. i would much rather go to emergency care w/o insurance than say have my house burn down(you can't get a mortage w/o it , by the way).car insurance? you can go to jail. no such penalty for lack of health insurance

2007-10-02 08:40:46 · answer #8 · answered by Manofthewest 5 · 1 1

You are surely opposed to helping your fellow human beings. You think of me, me, me, myself, and I and only that. Yes insurance can be seen as high. Quite frankly the only insurance I find unaffordable is medical insurance the rest is quite affordable. I am a good driver and get the right policies for my home and car. I don't believe in life insurance and so don't buy it. All Senator Clinton is advocating is AFFORDABLE health insurance paid to insurance companies just like you pay premiums to any other insurance company for anything else. But of course you hear only what your selfish little ears want to hear. Ms. Clinton, as most Democrats, cares about helping fellow human beings and not being selfish. One way to do that is to support AFFORDABLE health care for everyone so all can have quality health care and not only those wealthy enough to afford high priced insurance.

2007-10-02 08:10:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Why don't you check out the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to explain why health care is a right, but fire insurance wouldn't be.

2007-10-02 08:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers