2007-10-02 07:06:16 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
jurydoc: ah yes, I should offer a bit more of an explanation for those who are too young to remember - the National Organization for Women's rallying cry was "I Believe Anita Hill" from the moment the smear campaign began. Conversely, the NOW did not ever even attempt to ascertain facts about allegations made towards then-President Clinton by numerous women
2007-10-02 07:13:50 · update #1
For Agrle and others living in their own glass bubble: It's back in the news again, go figure!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071002/ap_on_go_su_co/anita_hill_thomas_3
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071002/us_nm/usa_court_thomas_dc_2
2007-10-02 07:19:25 · update #2
At the time, I recall liberal apologists shrieking that Anita is not voicing opposition towards Clarence Thomas for political reasons; she is not attempting to profit from her allegations, she is not politically motivated, etc.
What did she do? Started being a liberal activist; went on a speaking engagement tour, generating BIG money, made a career based on her notoriety for making unproven claims about Thomas. Wrote a book. She did everything her socialist apologists said she would not do.
I don't recall her being sought out by the media for comments for Billy's dozens of affairs and dozens of sexually harassed victims- Anita disappeared from the spotlight that made her career.
The lesson is rules and integrity are things to manipulate to your advantage if you are a liberal. Wrong doing is only wrong when it's a political adversary involved. Yeah, Packwood was wrong but Clinton is OK; David Duke is a racist but Sen Byrd is forgiven; the Clintons are OK but Nixon abused power. Sorry, comrade but all wrong is wrong.
What a perfect example of liberal hypocrisy.
Oh yeah, comrade, I already know your argument- Halliburton made a profit and Bush lied, so that gives you carte blanche to selectively choose wrong and right, based on political leaning.
2007-10-02 16:53:48 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My heavens, I never have been flashed, but I did unintentionally flash a few folks once. I was in the hospital some time back and decided to take a stoll to the vending area. Well, I wasn't thinking about what I was wearing and, let's just say that those hospital gowns don't leave a lot to the imagination on the backside. The nurse came up from behind me and put a blanket over my shoulders . . . I was wondering why it was a little drafty back there!
2016-04-07 00:33:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. Serious charges deserve investigation ONLY if a Republican is charged.
And did you note how all of the MSM is oohing and aahing over Anita Hill right now? Could it a way for them to attempt to neutralize Clarence Thomas's book and message???
I guess that's just a rhetorical question.
2007-10-02 09:07:21 · answer #3 · answered by SallyJM 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's because Clinton has a bigger Schlong, and he spreads the "wealth" around a bit more, so the chicks in NOW are not going to complain about getting some from him. If Clarence Thomas had "spread the wealth" more, then they'd like him too.
2007-10-03 04:42:39 · answer #4 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Liberals will always champion and somehow, justify, immorally when it carries the 'free' anything label.
All one has to do is look to their present replay of a Clinton for evidence of that.
They truly believe that those who are the most immoral will somehow nonetheless keep their promises if elected - go figure.....
2007-10-02 07:14:44 · answer #5 · answered by wider scope 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As long as anita said the right things the libs were going to back her.
When the libs want to destroy them nothing stands in their way.
2007-10-02 07:34:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Mrs. Clinton, tell us again how you turned $1000 into $100,000 by trading in cattle futures? And if you were so good at it, why did you quit? Mrs. Clinton, do you think being humiliated by your husband in front of the entire world qualifies you to be a senator? Does this also qualifiy you to be president? Mrs. Clinton, how many lamps and ashtrays did you throw at your husband during the eight years in the White House?
2007-10-02 07:12:26 · answer #7 · answered by The Slick Meister 2 · 8⤊ 3⤋
Hey........you couldn't believe these white gals claim against the "Fullbright" boy ......Clinton now could you. Its all OK...after all....Billy wanted it that way so he got it. Sexual harassment for Monica definitely should of been a been...class action suit would of been great...HA HA HA
2007-10-02 07:42:34 · answer #8 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The term for this would be selective outrage
2007-10-03 02:02:05 · answer #9 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is not only interesting but not very hard to figure out!! The liberal media and spin doctors have made a hero out of Bill for his sexual detantes..But it is unbelievable that Bill should have not done time for "rape" and other felonies!!!
2007-10-02 07:14:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋