English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is there any advantage to permanent insurance over term insurance or vis versa? I mean, basically it looks like term is the better deal because I can buy more death benefit for a lot less money, but permanent insurance gives me money with a death benefit. I'm in my late 40's, have a wife and 2 kids, normal bills, mortgage, etc. Does anyone have any opinions about what is really the better deal long term?

2007-10-02 06:51:26 · 11 answers · asked by Nathan S 1 in Business & Finance Personal Finance

11 answers

I have seen this one asked so many times it's amazing. Usually, you have 2 camps: the cash value (permanent) insurance camp and the term life camp. Both think that they are right.

The truth is that it depends. Now, it's nearly impossible to say what is the *best* option for you because I would need to know more about your financial situation. It's amazing how many websites and "experts" can say, off the cuff that one is better than another *all the time*.

The biggest advantage that term life insurance has over permanent is that it is cheaper in terms of coverage per thousand dollars of insurance. You will almost certainly be getting more death benefit with term insurance than with permanent insurance for the same amount of premium you are willing to pay.

The downside to term lies in in the fact that it gets more expensive as time goes on. Also, there is a reason why term insurance is so cheap. Depending on who you believe, only 1-20% of term policies ever pay out a claim. Now even at 20% (which I think is high), thats still not all that great if you ask me. Some might argue that with term insurance you can invest the difference. Meaning that if a permanent insurance policy costs you $100 per month and you receive $50,000 in death benefit then, as the argument goes, you could just as easily buy a $250,000 term life insurance policy for say $35/month and invest the remaining $65. Or you could buy less term insurance and have more to invest. The point is, the theory is that that by the time you reach age 65 (or whenever you plan on retiring), that you won't need life insurance. If you are quote: "smart with your money", you won't need life insurance.

I think that this is a myth for most people (but again, it largely depends on your situation). One of the problems with investing is that it doesn' t matter how smart you are with your money. Most average joe investors put their money into mutual funds. If that fund tanks 5 years before you retire, it is very likely that it will be extremely difficult to retire on what you thought you would be retiring on.

The other issue I have with the permanent vs. term debate is that folks that advocate term insurance usually try to compare permanent cash value life insurance to an investment. It's not. It was never meant to be. They complain about how low the rates of return are after expenses. Many times the internal rates of return are only 3-5%. But do you know what the definition of "cash value life insurance" is? It's not "a type of investment". It's considered "a death benefit with a *savings* component". Look at any high yield savings account or CD. What is the rate of return? 3-5%. Look at cash value life insurance. What is the internal net rate of return: 3-5%.

The problem with permanent insurance is that it's not a be all end all for retirement savings. Some folks think that this is all anyone should ever buy and that they should never consider anything else. They even go so far as to defend life insurance as a "good investment". Bad move IMO.

My opinion is that BOTH sides are wrong. That's something of an answer for you. If you want more in depth details, read this article: http://www.twintierfinancial.com/articles/Life_Insurance.html

2007-10-02 07:38:05 · answer #1 · answered by The Financial Doctor 2 · 1 0

I would recommend that you try this site where onel can get rates from different companies: http://PROTECTIONQUOTES.NET/index.html?src=3YAbqahlVA81

RE :What kind of life insurance is better for me, term insurance or permanent insurance?
Is there any advantage to permanent insurance over term insurance or vis versa? I mean, basically it looks like term is the better deal because I can buy more death benefit for a lot less money, but permanent insurance gives me money with a death benefit. I'm in my late 40's, have a wife and 2 kids, normal bills, mortgage, etc. Does anyone have any opinions about what is really the better deal long term?
Follow 10 answers

2016-11-26 13:45:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

You can get quotes in just a few minutes at - SALESQUOTES.INFO-

RE What kind of life insurance is better for me, term insurance or permanent insurance?

Is there any advantage to permanent insurance over term insurance or vis versa? I mean, basically it looks like term is the better deal because I can buy more death benefit for a lot less money, but permanent insurance gives me money with a death benefit. I'm in my late 40's, have a wife and 2 kids, normal bills, mortgage, etc. Does anyone have any opinions about what is really the better deal long term?

2014-10-01 09:57:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

I suggest one to try this internet site where onel can get rates from different companies: http://COVERAGEQUOTES.NET/index.html?src=2YAqzjnjFM51

RE :What kind of life insurance is better for me, term insurance or permanent insurance?
Is there any advantage to permanent insurance over term insurance or vis versa? I mean, basically it looks like term is the better deal because I can buy more death benefit for a lot less money, but permanent insurance gives me money with a death benefit. I'm in my late 40's, have a wife and 2 kids, normal bills, mortgage, etc. Does anyone have any opinions about what is really the better deal long term?
Follow 9 answers

2016-08-23 18:27:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

If you're looking for long term life insurance you'll want to go with permanent. Term insurance usually only allows coverage for a certain number of years and the only payment will come at the time of death. Permanent insurance usually has cash out options, hence the higher price. It really depends on your needs. If you only need a few years of coverage, at which point you'll no longer be considering life insurance coverage, then term insurance would probably be the better purchase.

2007-10-02 06:58:25 · answer #5 · answered by mplsundin 4 · 0 0

For free insurance quotes

2014-12-26 19:18:07 · answer #6 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

At your age, go with term. It's cheaper and you can get a lot more coverage. The purpose of life insurance is to take care of your wife and kids financially should you die. It is not an investment.

2007-10-02 07:02:09 · answer #7 · answered by bdancer222 7 · 1 1

Term is always better. Its way cheaper. You just need it to cover your kids in case you die.
Permanent Ins. is alot higher plus you have all the fees. Take the money you save and invest it. Or just put it in the bank. You will come out ahead.

2007-10-02 08:09:58 · answer #8 · answered by heybulldog 5 · 0 1

Term because it is a locked in rate for 10,20,30 years. Also benefites are paid in full even if you die 2 weeks after buying it. Well, with Allstate it is.

2007-10-02 06:59:36 · answer #9 · answered by Your #1 fan 6 · 0 1

You can find the best rates and offers for your insurance at: COVERAGEDEALS.NET

2014-05-15 12:48:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers