2007-10-02 05:54:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
That is a good way to get hit by lightening and having the whole set up shorted out. Be careful when alternating like that.
2007-10-02 07:11:41 · answer #1 · answered by ghouly05 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That would actually INCREASE the discharge-rate. The human animal is a rather inefficient machine, and the increase in reciprocal motion would not result in sufficient energy production to offset the energy consumption.
2007-10-02 06:25:05 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen H 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there is no connection between battery inner resistance and charging present day. a chargeable battery is charged with a relentless present day until the terminal voltage reaches the specified value. The charging present day to apply is (0.a million)*AH in amperes.
2016-12-14 05:41:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am POSITIVE that would end up being a NEGATIVE situation! Although he could consider getting a jump start on a new flame. I just hope there's no caustic feelings...
2007-10-02 10:16:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't give the cad a nickel, directly, unless he kept his eye on the current gal.
2007-10-02 06:25:08 · answer #5 · answered by ponyboy 81 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not if he doesn't want to end up with a short circuit and blow out BOTH fuses ;-)
2007-10-02 07:22:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if he was♫ Big Audio Dynamite ♫ he would just get a rush of power
2007-10-02 11:44:08 · answer #7 · answered by ausblue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He would run off and see how faraday would take him before connecting with another!
2007-10-02 07:14:32 · answer #8 · answered by Ian M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋