Another inquest is now going to happen? Why is this?
2007-10-02 04:21:16 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Who needs an expensive inquest?
The drunk driver crashed the car, the only person who was wearing a seat belt is the only one that is alive today.
Conclusions:
1. Don't drink and drive; It's incredibly dangerous.
2. Seat belts save lives.
There I've just saved the tax payer a fortune on an expensive inquest.
2007-10-02 04:33:04 · answer #1 · answered by mainwoolly 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
EXACTLY!!! The only thing we're going to learn from this British inquest is exactly what we already know! There is no new information to find out. She died in a drunk driving accident, and she wasn't wearing a seat belt. End of story...buckle up or die, right??
2007-10-05 12:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by Lady Miss Keir 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sir John Stevens, the former commissioner of the Met, had an enquiry and concluded that it was nothing more than a tragic accident.
I don't know why on earth more money is being wasted on this question. Drunk driver, high speed chase, no seat belts - I don't know what's so hard for people to grasp.
2007-10-02 06:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just saw Sky poll? 1/3 people believe it was not an accident and was it high 60s% believe that truth will never be told
2007-10-02 04:28:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
people did not believe the first one
2007-10-02 06:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by Nora 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋