USC fans and the media excuses for USC
They play all thier games away:
Fact: USC plays 6 games away LSU 5
USC wins most of their confrence games every year:
Yes, in fact of all of the Pac-10 National Championships USC is more than 70%, where as the SEC has More national titles and is spread evenly within the SEC.
2007-10-02 04:05:40 · 11 answers · asked by Mr. Logic 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Therefore: the only team in the PAC-10 that is competitive is USC. Logically they would always win against a very weak confrence. Conclusion is an undefeated USC team has no meaning.
2007-10-02 04:25:16 · update #1
OK YOU WANT SOME FACTS:
Pac-10 Champions played in only 4 National Title Games in the past 27 years; SEC CHAMPIONS PLAYED IN 8; Pac-10 Champions only in ranked in top 3 5 times in past 27 years, SEC CHAMPIONS RANKED IN TOP 3, 11 TIMES IN PAST 27 YEARS
2007-10-02 08:51:53 · update #2
for someone who calls himself "Mr. Logic", youre certainly not using very much. its not the # of away games, but WHO youre playing away!!! you can have 10 away games a year...if theyre all against DIV 1AA teams, you think it matters??? Look at each teams AWAY schedule, ie who theyre playing, and then get back to me.
ALL of USCs tough games are away...ALL of LSUs tough games are at home...do the math...
2007-10-02 05:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by FIGHT ON! 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The media knows that USC is a really good team which is why they love em. They're a fun team to watch with lots of great players that makes lots of big plays. Kinda like Miami in the past, but this time it's USC. It may not last forever, but that's the way it is now whether people like it or not. The media will still root for USC, win or lose.
2007-10-02 04:35:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Conclusion is an undefeated USC team has no meaning. HAHAHA Logic at its finest.
Why don't you do a little research and you will see that historically the pac-10 has measured up to the other major conferences. Actually research should be the foundation of your analysis and obviously you have done none.
The Pac-10 is historically not the best and not the worst. Educate yourself.
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/pac10/vs_conf.php
2007-10-02 06:04:09 · answer #3 · answered by Bruce Tzu 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lure of the hollywood life in a great climate such as southern california drives talent from all over the U.S> towards USC. Players know that the limelight in such a high media based state as california would do much to help their advancement towards the NFL. USC uses that to raid great talent from other states. Right now it is very evident that they love LoUiSiAna talent. Look at their QB and running back .
2007-10-02 06:21:16 · answer #4 · answered by Rudy L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Exactly. USC has no competition in the PAC-10. California is the second best team in the conference and they only played tennesee and oregon which both aren't very good. they just do this so they can say that PAC-10 is better than SEC when even NFL sportswriters say that SEC is the best conference in the nation.
2007-10-02 04:29:11 · answer #5 · answered by GIB_GUY 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually USC wasn't good until Pete Carrol for the most part. The funny part though is look how easy it should be for them to recruit. They have a big name program. They are in a great location. They SHOULD be winning the titles. It is like the Yankees in a sense.
2007-10-02 04:23:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You see, the whole world knows USC is the best football team ever in history.
Which is why media loves USC
media stick with the winner
not a loser
Fight ON!!
Root for USC
2007-10-02 04:08:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
USC have seven title because thy used to play in the rose bowl which is in their backyard,and thy always play a big ten team thy are not that good
2007-10-02 04:14:29 · answer #8 · answered by paulcondo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why generalise? I am a shia and do not believe that my brothers and sisters in Islam, Sunnis, will go to hell. Does that itself destroy your whole question?.. Neither is your question representative of the whole shia or countries. You show me al-kafi and other shia sources written by man, not infallible, but even generalising all the shia can be a crime itself. Are you not scared for the millions of people being accused of this "kuffer" and "hell" by you? Are you prepared to take all the blame in yawmuddin. I know many shia for I my self am one.. We never say who is kaffir or go to hell.. 7aram on how to say this question.. Even the post you provided states "Am I going to declare them kaffirs? Again, no. What I have learnt when reverting to the Shia Madh'ab is the importance of leaving the judgement of one's faith to Allah (swt) alone" look up the post and see it for your self. Ya akhi.. leave the judgement to Allah (swt) and don't be blinded by a single piece of information from the internet.. Wallahi I love sunnis as they are my brothers and sisters in Islam! We all pray to Allah (swt), the one god, don't we?.. and follow the messenger (pbuh). Majority of the Shia don't think that way. There are extremes on both Shia and Sunnis, so please don't generalise and spread those fitna. It may not only give you sins but for everyone who passes it to others and it all comes back to you. Why would you call me a kaffir for mutah.. I myself will never do these acts or even think about it ! .. Remember.. We get judged on our acts brothers but not what is in the texts!. Forget the books, many shia as well as me don't approve of them.. We are all muslims but only Allah (Swt) knows who is not. Salam
2016-04-07 00:20:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was stupid. I would respond in detail but your probably at day care right now.
2007-10-02 05:29:12 · answer #10 · answered by vae4usc 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋