Just for the sake of conversation. Say bigfoot is real (im not saying he is and im not saying he isnt). Your out hunting your in a deer stand or something hidden from view or just walking around the woods with a gun lol. anyway he doesnt see you and you have a shot. Do you take it and finally have proof he exists or do you let him go on his way and the legend continues?
2007-10-02 03:36:17 · 11 answers · asked by Brad 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
No because it could be another hunter in a suit trying to pull a prank. My dad and his friends used to do this sort of thing when he was out hunting. If you shot somebody that would be manslaughter. If you really want proof next time you go hunting if you do set bear traps they'll catch anything bigfoot, yeti, abominable snowman whatever. Just let it go there is no discernable test for bigfoot anyway.
Good Luck
2007-10-02 07:14:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless I thought I was threatened I wouldn't shoot. The risk of it being some guy in a suit pulling a prank would be too great to take the chance. Frankly since I don't think there is such a thing as Bigfoot the chances that it would be a guy in a suit would be pretty close to 100 percent. Of course without a Bigfoot corpse people like me will never be convinced that it's a real animal so I would be willing to forgive anyone who did pull the trigger and proved that it's not all a hoax.
2007-10-04 10:53:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at it logically. What evidence do we have that he exists? 1. Big plaster molds of footprints 2. Some poor quality video or images 3. Sightings by people who claim to have seen him. Now, what kind of evidence would a large ape leave behind generally? 1. droppings 2. hair or other dna 3. evidence of feeding (vegitation being eater or the remains of caracasses). 4. dead bodies. 5. footprints 6. sightings The idea of bigfoot romping around somewhere in the US is old enough that if there was just one - he would have died of old age by now. So there must be enough of them for them to find mates and have children, just enough to continue the species, but still, more then one. A group of bigfoots would most definatly leave some kind of evidence other then a big foot print in the mud. So I lean towards an answer of no. That being said, It would be very interesting if it were true.
2016-05-19 01:39:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't shoot anything that isn't in season! If it was bigfoot season I would say yes.
2007-10-02 04:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Beatle fanatic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a horrible idea to shoot the animal. Get a bb gun and shoot at targets.
2007-10-02 04:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Reflect the sun in his eyes with a mirror and run.
2007-10-02 07:24:53 · answer #6 · answered by thomas m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I shoot his a@#! And then I'll be known as the one who got him, and laid the legend to rest! Besides, if there is one, there are bound to be more.
2007-10-02 04:37:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm of Yeti decent, so I'd let him go, as we may be related.
2007-10-02 03:39:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
let him leave i ahve freinds in the himalayas that have expericnes with yeti.
2007-10-02 03:44:26 · answer #9 · answered by possessed by insanity 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"If it moves, shoot. If it shoots, move!"
Just make sure it isn't someone in a suit, first.
2007-10-02 03:40:28 · answer #10 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋