part of it's empire to be ruled over by the US & Israeli Govts?
-That would take care of Iran's nukes/radical mullahs
-Terrorists would be have to spend all of their time fighting US/Israel militaries in the muslim mideast (which is pretty much what they are doing right now)
-There wouldn't be any threat of a larger regional civil war in the Mideast between Sunnis & Shiites.
-And the Israeli military would essentially quadruple in size because of the permenant US military presence in Iraq.
2007-10-02 02:18:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
None of them want us bringing any kind of government to them. We've brought dictatorships and suffering over there for the last halfcentury. The less that we interfere with them the better for them and for us.
2007-10-02 02:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
usa + democracy, oh puhlleassseeee!
i wish you americans would stop spouting that nonsense, you can't even exercise democracy or freedom in your own country let alone export it.
the only thing that resembles sense in this question is stating empire + usa + israel. thats so freaking obvious what the usa is doing, so lets not disguise it. we know what america is doing, we see your country for the murderous regime it is.
the usa empire will fall apart before it gets a foothold and I will be there to dance on the grave of usa imperialism.
2007-10-03 05:10:26 · answer #2 · answered by wotzthepoint? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is garbage. Who wants it? We won what we set out to do, so let's go home and let the Muslims fight it out among themselves. They do it so well. If Saudi Arabia is afraid that Iraq and Iran would come after it then let them send troops to Iraq Now to prove where they stand. The USA now knows exactly what it means in trying to deal with the Arabs. Hopeless!
2007-10-02 09:41:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any attempt by any superior power to impose its ideology on other countries, like democrasy, has always been been anchored on false analogy; that just because the US, for instance, or Britain, in the past, were able to subjugate other countries in their dominion doesn't mean they can be successful in transplanting it, generally elsewhere, especially in the Middle East.
2007-10-02 10:53:19 · answer #4 · answered by Lance 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought that was what we were doing?
In case you hadn't noticed, it isn't really cost effective.
The rebels use twenty dollars worth of outdated, military surplus to blow up a 500,000 to million dollar piece of equipment, AND our troops. Who is getting the short end of the stick?
If/ when we pull out the different factions will vie for control of the area for years, it won't matter when we pull out, it will still happen. This isn't checkers, there is no "win" there waiting for us to figure out.
2007-10-02 09:28:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Go back to sleep obviously attempting to form coherent thoughts has tired your small brain.
There is no reason for terrorists to stay in the middle east fighting Israel and the USA in case you have not noticed they attack outside the middle east as well.
After all their job is to terrorize their enemies in their homeland, USA etc...
2007-10-02 09:25:16 · answer #6 · answered by conranger1 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Since the US obviously can't bring democracy to the Mideast".......and we have no right to even try by any means other than setting a good example....which we are not.....why not just leave them alone?
2007-10-02 09:27:25 · answer #7 · answered by amazed we've survived this l 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Better yet, why don't you go over there as a Diplomat and reason with the unreasonable. Have a nice stoning!
2007-10-02 09:22:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Zeldarblomqar says it all for me.
2007-10-02 09:30:43 · answer #9 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋