English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They certainly can't attack the substance of it. They have nothing less than ad hominem attacks. Just like they did to Paula Jones and Linda Tripp. Dragging these women down in the mud and ridiculing their God given feminine beauty. Shame on the left.

2007-10-01 18:57:35 · 13 answers · asked by reaganite27 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Daniel ~ You're right. Liberals LOVE free speech unless they don't agree with you. In that case you must be silenced because you "spew hatred". LMAO.

2007-10-01 19:03:02 · update #1

mild irritant ~ Wrong. Do you think those cowboys out in Wyoming who granted women the right to vote were big government Democrats?!? The Republican Party has always fought for minority rights. They did found the NAACP after all.

2007-10-01 19:07:39 · update #2

here to help ~ Thanks for yet another *yawn* ad hominem attack. Read her book, you'd find yourself on her side more often than you think.

2007-10-01 19:12:20 · update #3

Charlie Who?

2007-10-01 19:20:14 · update #4

13 answers

Of course they will.

And, we will be treated to a day of brilliant examples of "liberal tolerance" (We HAVE to be tolerant of EVERYTHING they think, say, do or believe, but God help us if we think, say, do or believe differently) when they call for her death on here, the more violent the death the better.

2007-10-01 19:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Assassination is kind of extreme, I was kind of hoping she would just waste away. Or maybe the weight of her adam's apple would break her own neck or something like that. But assassination? We liberals are peaceful, remember?

2007-10-02 08:01:12 · answer #2 · answered by Big Paesano 4 · 0 1

I find it amusing that ANY woman could call herself a Republican, given that the Republicn party has fought tooth and nail AGAINST the right's of women - INCLUDING the right to vote - from the very beginning.

I guess some women just think they were meant to be barefoot and pregnant.

2007-10-02 02:05:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

I don't know. Will the neocons attack Charlie Savage when his book comes out tomorrow? They certainly can't attack the substance of it. By the way, the title is Take Over: The return of the Imperial Presidency.

2007-10-02 02:12:48 · answer #4 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 2 5

No, they'll cry and whine and show their hypocrisy some more. I..e. attacking Dixie Chicks: BAD! It's their first amendment right. Attacking Ann Coulter: GOOD! She's evil and doesn't share our opinions, so she must be destroyed.

edit: Here to Help: explain that to Gershom.

2007-10-02 02:01:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

You must be spoofing us.

OK, I agree that there likely is not enough substance for anybody to attack in her book, but referring to her as a beauty is pushing it past satire.

2007-10-02 03:06:55 · answer #6 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 1 3

Ann Coulter will definitely be ridiculed by the Liberals because it is their natural reaction but it is the people who will judge who is right between them.

2007-10-02 02:04:24 · answer #7 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 4 4

how do you kill the undead/not living? you have a strange definition of beauty.

added. daniel,death threats are not protected by the first amendment.

added. i have read some of her writing and listened to her,my answer stands. I don't judge her based on what others say,i think for myself.

2007-10-02 02:04:30 · answer #8 · answered by here to help 7 · 1 5

No, only ad-homo-nims.
Welcome Coultergeist.

2007-10-02 02:43:52 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 0 2

pretty much. its not like they've ever dealt with one of her arguments.

2007-10-02 06:19:19 · answer #10 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers