2007-10-01 16:58:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
first we have to figure out how to do it and then think on "permi-scuous" or how "deli-scuous" that would be.
2007-10-01 18:55:26 · answer #1 · answered by sup 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hon...the word "permiscuous" has sexual over tones to me so I am having a bit of time wrapping my mind around this question. While I can see the symbolizm of the cue in the area of maleness and maybe seeing the ball's round shape was a female symbol but the definition of "us" has me confused. Oh... H***, I have no idea where I am going with this!!
2007-10-02 01:12:53 · answer #2 · answered by Praire Crone 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In trying to keep my mind out of the sexualness of this question here's my opinion.
The cue would be poking into everyone's business until we fell into a hole and couldn't get out? Until a friend (or higher power) helped us out and then it would start all over again.
I would not want to be a cue. But then again maybe it would be fun to try.
2007-10-02 13:45:54 · answer #3 · answered by Tigger 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly.
2007-10-02 00:08:59 · answer #4 · answered by Immortal Cordova 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so. Although the stripes and the solids are wholesome in my book.
2007-10-02 00:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by Andrew O 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if both parties gave their consensual permission.
2007-10-02 07:21:12 · answer #6 · answered by Doctor Strange 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Promiscuity is better, veiled.
2007-10-02 02:21:37 · answer #7 · answered by Marguerite 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, not in the least.
2007-10-02 11:41:13 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ cat furrever ♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
???
Dewd...... You got me on this one âº
Doug
2007-10-02 00:06:33 · answer #9 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋