legal question: condo conversion, relocation assistance?

Question

does anyone know where I can go for low cost legal help in Los Angeles? What requirements do the owners have towards the tenants? Do the requirements change if tenants were aware of condo conversion plans before move-in? I moved in 11/05. Conversion was suppose to start 4/06, nothing happened. I never received any kind of notice or information on it. How much notice are they required to give? Does anyone know where in the SFV or Los Angeles area I can go for more information and legal help on this matter.

Answer 1

I don't know California law, but...

Do you have an actual lease or are you a month-to-month renter? If you have a signed and valid lease you are probably ok until it expires. If you are month-to-month then they are well within their rights to give you thirty days notice and expect you out at the end of the 30 days.

If you knew about the conversion of the apartments into condos before moving in you are going to be out of luck.

I would expect no relocation assistance.

You've lived there for almost 2 years knowing this was going to happen and now that it is happening you are surprised? Really?

Good luck!

Answer 2

Websites like FindLaw, LawGuru are some of the free legal advice resources available. More information at http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html

Answer 3

<> in basic terms via fact something it legal would not propose it rather is ideal. <> there's a reason you won't be able to spell 'anticipate' devoid of '***'. people who anticipate too lots finally end up making asses of themselves. <> would not make experience, does it - and yet, there you're advocating human beings only anticipate the government is right! <> incorrect! <> advert hominem assaults harm your credibility. per danger Marc, like me, would not see too lots interior the way of credibility whilst analyzing your question. <> The term "fetus" actually skill "the extra youthful interior the womb". The fetus IS a living person. existence starts off at theory, no longer start nor some arbitrary ingredient in between. subsequently, each and every abortion constitutes the homicide of an unborn person. <> however the fetus IS human. subsequently, abortion IS homicide. <> what's so narrow minded approximately acknowledging the unborn for the living human beings they are? for the reason which you're no longer able to try this, does no longer that propose your concepts is rather extra narrow than mine? <> That in basic terms is going to coach how schizophrenic human institutions could be - and you opt for to anticipate such an enterprise (the government) is right.