2007-10-01 16:31:56 · 8 answers · asked by a person of interest 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, we should withdraw immediately. As for the first responder, I'd like to remind her that without the US, the UN would cease to exist.
2007-10-01 17:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. The UN accomplishes a lot of good. The opposition to it comes from the extreme right--and isessentially based on the fact that the UN provides a public forum that isn't under their control--so they can't silence criticism of their war-mongering agenda.
2007-10-02 01:03:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES!!! they are the useless nations. we have NATO . we don't need to be part of the socialist country club called the UN. Koffy and son are theives and Iran is on human rights board, Friggen joke!!!!!
2007-10-02 00:21:26 · answer #3 · answered by NEOBillyfree 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The point to international dimplomacy - you have to talk to people you don't like.
The alternative is to go to war with the people you don't like. And all the people that don't like you, go to war with you. That was WW I.
It should also be noted that had England not been at war with just about everyone, the American Revolution might have been a failure.
2007-10-01 23:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by dryheatdave 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!
2007-10-01 23:38:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
YES , YES , YES ...
What governement has no land , no money , major control over other countries laws and no people ?
2007-10-01 23:39:39 · answer #6 · answered by Robert F 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One can only hope!
2007-10-02 01:03:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why!
Better question might be.. should the U.S. stop acting like it is the U.N.
2007-10-01 23:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋