2007-10-01 14:28:02 · 9 answers · asked by gentlepete07 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
What an irony?
Is Britney Spear's the father of the child? Or Keven is the father? If the role of father to give full support to his child to his wife or other woman relegated to the mother, then that is a great insult to a man because, In our cultures and tradion the father & or head of the family when getting married is the role responsibility to give subsistence, shelter and all neccessary needed by the child. The role of the mother (Britney Spear) should be limited as in minor obligation to support the child compare to Keven as the father of the child who should shoulder the giant share of responsibility.
Do not twist the world and change the rules of laws that the woman should be the one obliged to give full support to a child making way to the father as insolvent.
2007-10-01 19:49:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is a query for his criminal expert If it replaced into Ordered in courtroom on the Divorce then definite. If the decide exceeded Down a courtroom Order saying XXY lots toddler help until age 18 then definite it should be paid. until certainly one of them bypass to courtroom and have the toddler help settlement bumped off. Then whilst the courtroom say it is stopped then and in basic terms then Does the help end until the toddler Reaches 18. Or is ruled Disabled then they'd desire to would desire to pay help.
2016-12-17 14:42:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wait a minute. i thought the custody was still 50/50. if it's 50/50 then no one pays support to anyone.
LMFAO at the first post!!!
2007-10-01 17:16:00 · answer #3 · answered by Isabella S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess so, just because she is the mum doesnt mean she shouldnt pay.
She should put money aside now as well for when the kids are in therapy when they are older, for the way she has treated them.
2007-10-01 14:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was asking for 45,00000 and he would let her have the boys but she refused now she is going to be paying out of her a s s for him to take care of the boys.
2007-10-01 15:00:40 · answer #5 · answered by Teenie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably, but he didn't win custody; he was granted custody and it was taken away from her by a judge who decided it was not in the children's best interest to live with her.....frankly, I don't think they are in the greatest position with their father either.....but I'm not the judge
2007-10-01 14:31:23 · answer #6 · answered by abc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She sure will, for as long as he has custody of them.
2007-10-01 14:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-10-01 14:38:58 · answer #8 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely.. and poor Kevin, the kids are really gonna cut into his concert touring.. lmao
2007-10-01 14:30:52 · answer #9 · answered by maccrew6 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋