2007-10-01 12:57:08 · 29 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they re about the same. both are overrated, and both love da ladies!!!
2007-10-01 13:00:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 6⤋
There is NO comparison.
JFK was much further to the Right than George Bush.
Hillary is not quite as far Left as Carl Marx.
2007-10-01 23:29:01 · answer #2 · answered by Philip H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh hell! She's not even in the same league. She's nowhere CLOSE! He's on the top rung of the ladder, she's still in the que a mile back.
Our political atmosphere would be light years ahead if JFK had completed a term or two.
2007-10-01 20:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by kj 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is a nonsense question reality, in what WAY do you want want to know how she stacks up?
Height? Kennedy was taller, but had more melanin in his DNA than Hillary, while Clinton wins in the childbirthing and rearing departments. Both had to deal with infidelity in the White House, both could have done more, had the Republican Congress in both cases allowed it, considering how many Republicans in the 60's flat out LOATHED Kennedy for his perceived insanity in giving "the coloreds" too many civil rights (I don't think Hillary is quite as reviled as Kennedy was then), there have been right wing "WANTED FOR TREASON" posters printed about each, both candidates scare(d) the living hell out of those heavily invested in the status quo... need I go on? Your question is much too broad; narrow your focus and ask again, please.
Politics? Anything I say supporting a female Presidential candidate is going to be "Thumb's Down"'d into oblivion, but that's the price of Free Speech, right?
2007-10-01 20:12:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
This is too difficult to gauge b/c Hillary has not served as president yet.
Also, the issues are different. After seeing how JFK botched Vietnam, we may draw some comparisons with Hillary and Iraq. JFK of course is a better orator, but Hillary is not bad either. She is masterful at debates and so was JFK(especially in 1960 against Nixon).
2007-10-01 20:02:34 · answer #5 · answered by Rishi M 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Not even close to JFK. Hillery Rotten Clinton. Peace
2007-10-01 20:08:48 · answer #6 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hilary isn't a hair on JFK's bal^&&^)&s. She will not be elected now or ever. If by some chance she did make it to the nations highest office. Pack your bags and move to Canada or Mexico your life will be better there while she is in office tearing down the foundation of our Nation.
2007-10-01 20:02:03 · answer #7 · answered by aswkingfish 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
JFK opposed the NWO - Clintons are part of IT
2007-10-01 20:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by celvin 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
not even close,jfk would have launched icbm's the day 911 happened
2007-10-01 22:20:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Compared to the good old fashioned patriotic American J.F.K, Hillary is an anti-capitalist, anti- U.S. military, pro- socialist, and pro- feminism extremism.
Good question though.
I'll star it.
2007-10-01 20:33:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is a character all unto herself. She cannot be "stacked-up" as you put it, against anyone.
2007-10-01 20:01:25 · answer #11 · answered by The Wiz 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋