it seems like again and again their goal has been nothing but to waste military resources and human lives, try to justify the truly unjustifyable (Iraq) and try to strengthen al Qaida by de-stabilizing the entire Persian Gulf region and giving al Qaida the best recruitment tool they could have ever dreamed (again, Iraq)?
2007-10-01 12:03:36 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush and Bin Laden families have been friends and business partners for decades. Bin Laden money helped bail Dubya out of at least one of his many failed business ventures.
2007-10-01 12:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
Bin Laden is a non factor.
Because of Bush he forced to live in some old crusty cave.
Bush is killing Al Qaida by the thousands in Iraq.
Better there than over here!
2007-10-01 19:09:09 · answer #2 · answered by DANCER 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
ianmcilnay below declares the country harboring Bin Laden is a sovereign nation and our ally, therefor we have no right to invade and look for him there.
Lovely how it all works out.
I have come to accept that if Bush found Bin Laden's exact location (assuming he doesn't already have it) he would send a get well card and a thank you note. Many see it this way, and the Bush supporters who dodge this question over and over simply reveal that they support what is obviously a very corrupt and deceptive political agenda.
2007-10-01 19:12:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Bin Laden is in Pakistan in a mountainous region that would cost many troops their lives if we tried to locate him. Not to mention that Pakistan is a sovereign nation and an ally and doesn't want us to invade.
2007-10-01 19:09:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The search for Bin Laden does not take 150,000 of our military. He is being hunted by some very bad boys in our elite Spec Ops units..and one day will be dragged from his cave by one of them.
2007-10-01 19:09:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush: We will hunt down those responsible and bring them to justice.
Bush (today): http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/14/barnes-osama/
(it is a Fox News clip. So enjoy, conservatives!)
Dancer, Bin Laden is NOT a non-factor. If you have been paying attention, you'd know he is still alive and able to give orders to his fellow terrorists.
2007-10-01 19:09:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
My foot they do not want him. Where he is now we would lose more troops trying to get him than we are in Iraq. Go look at a map.Peace
2007-10-01 19:14:12 · answer #7 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would like to see your links on this. Including inferences to Bin Laden family in Saudi and GW from one answerer. Thanks for the heads up I can research on my own. BRB
2007-10-01 19:13:10 · answer #8 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Uh, are you aware of the number of troops in Afghanistan...you remember that tiny little country, don't you?
Nobody is adamant about NOT going after bin Laden. We are just not telling the world where we are looking. ID10T!
2007-10-01 19:08:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
We are.
Some of you little kids are so uninformed and silly.
You have NO IDEA what's going on.
We ARE after Clinton's buddy Osama bin Laden.
2007-10-01 19:12:25 · answer #10 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
if you really believe that, you libs are stupider than i thought. stop it with the paranoid conspiracy theory. do you really think killing bin laden would help anything. and if we did kill him, you libs would blame president bush for any terrorist actions following.
2007-10-01 19:10:37 · answer #11 · answered by andy c 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋